Chrissy

Stormy Daniels

107 posts in this topic

On ‎6‎/‎3‎/‎2018 at 9:54 PM, lintlizard said:

 but when our actions betray and hurt the S.O.'s we profess to love and honor, well .... that's messed up.

LMAO!  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/3/2018 at 7:54 PM, lintlizard said:

...

All of us likely have a story behind the reason for our kink, but when our actions betray and hurt the S.O.'s we profess to love and honor, well .... that's messed up.

...

^ This ^ is a prime reason I saw escorts instead of having civilian affairs when I was married.  Who needs a Fatal Attraction situation?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Bit Banger said:

^ This ^ is a prime reason I saw escorts instead of having civilian affairs when I was married.  Who needs a Fatal Attraction situation?

Yeah, definitely don't want to find the kid's bunny boiling on the stove!  Then it becomes a family affair....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/30/2018 at 0:50 PM, airamericavet65 said:

Then put in term limits to keep the new batch from becoming as corrupt

Here's why here's why I don't understand Democrats. One Democratic president gets his d*ck sucked in the Oval Office, and they blame the non-professional  woman that did it. They vilify her in the press and personally and call the president of victim of her predatory behavior.

One future president who ran as a Republican, had his d*ck sucked by a professional, when he was not in the Oval Office, and they blamed that future, and now, president for the event. They vilify him in the press and personally, and call the woman a victim of his predatory behavior.

 Is this a double standard, or what?

 

The Wise Old Owl

Sorry.

No sex.

We're British.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, The Wise Old Owl said:

Here's why here's why I don't understand Democrats. One Democratic president gets his d*ck sucked in the Oval Office, and they blame the non-professional  woman that did it. They vilify her in the press and personally and call the president of victim of her predatory behavior.

One future president who ran as a Republican, had his d*ck sucked by a professional, when he was not in the Oval Office, and they blamed that future, and now, president for the event. They vilify him in the press and personally, and call the woman a victim of his predatory behavior.

 Is this a double standard, or what?

 

The Wise Old Owl

Sorry.

No sex.

We're British.

Take Trump out of the equation and put Obama instead,   we get the complete opposite reaction. When it comes down to it, religion is the preferred weapon of choice.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

regardless if you're blue or red, the people pulling media strings dictate how an event is framed...

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Stormy for me. I’m saving for hot TOB gals.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Skg said:

No Stormy for me. I’m saving for hot TOB gals.

Hell, I couldn't afford Stormy for one thing. Besides, she has nothing on the "LADIES OF TOB".

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth pointing out (or maybe it isn't) that the reason the Stormy Daniels thing is a big deal isn't because it happened, but because the way the payment was handled probably constitutes a campaign finance violation. 

I mean, obviously people are obsessed with the fact that it happened. People love this kind of shit. It feels especially validating to the left because of the way evangelicals are happy to give him a pass on this.

But that's not why this situation is legally perilous for 45. There's nothing legally wrong with raw-dogging a pornstar and paying her to be quiet about it. And it may not be morally wrong to many people. But you're not allowed to pay someone to be quiet to help a candidate's campaign.

It matters that Cohen told the story about taking out a loan on his house to make this payment himself without telling his client. That was him shifting the liability completely to himself. Of course later on he changed his story and indicated that he was directed to do so and we have yet to see what comes of his alleged 70 hours of testimony to 1 or more grand juries.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! A federal judge has ordered Stormy to pay $293,000 in legal fees.

That’s a lot of her future earning power gone. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Her net worth is in the millions, and we haven't even started talking about book royalties.  The attorney's fee request is upon appeal, and should be tossed as excessive.

Personally, I love Stormy.  Not so much her attorney, but she is one tough gal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the claim was from Trump’s lawyers-du-jour. She lost her case against him and he’s sued for attorney;s fees. I could be wrong though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops, I'm a couple days behind, that new number was the result of the appeal of a much higher number.  The point remains that her other lawsuit against Trump is still going forward, and she could get a much larger award, or lose again.  That's what you get when you roll the dice.  But, she's too smart to bet the house, I read that her net worth is north of $4 million, just from her porn productions, so even if she has to pay it, it pales in comparison to the publicity she has gotten.  You could not buy that much publicity for ten times that fee award.

I want to see the book deal.

I admire her, as a business owner.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now