Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tide32

Haven't Seen this before.

20 posts in this topic

Top Notch Chloe 720-909-7925
Colorado Companion

I don't know or just can't remember, seeing a provider, posting pictures with a kid in the background before. Has anyone seen this young lady before.. https://theotherboard.com/users/164303

 

Edited by TheWhisperer
image removed TOS
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that is not cool at all. That has to break some sort of rule. Also looks like she just joined TOB a couple of days ago. Maybe time for a refresher on what it takes for a new lady to join this site?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Mustang87 said:

Yeah, that is not cool at all. That has to break some sort of rule. Also looks like she just joined TOB a couple of days ago. Maybe time for a refresher on what it takes for a new lady to join this site?

She also has a pic where is she is nude and shows bush which is also against TOB rules.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought bush was ok, but lips are not - which she also displays. Not that I am complaining...  If this is now OK, then I hope other companions take the hint and follow suit! 

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, sb1212 said:

I thought bush was ok, but lips are not - which she also displays. Not that I am complaining...  If this is now OK, then I hope other companions take the hint and follow suit! 

Not in a million years!!

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This one may set a new record for most red flags in a single ad.  First off the minor in a pic?  WTF I thought new ladies were closely screened and had to have references.  Who includes THAT background in an ad pic and WHO vouches for someone that does?  And why allow it to bee posted to begin with.

Next the phone number in profile - (720) 776-6623 - has over 300 ad hits on SUMO ALL for a black trans lady.  That tells me whoever placed the ad places ads for more than one person and forgot who he was posting for or mixed up numbers - followed by the really awkward "try this number" statement on ad here.  Three possibilities when that comes up - massive coincidence that an escort just happens to get the same phone number another escort used to own, LE or pimp. I do not believe in coincidence, do you?

Lastly as far as wanting to trash the joint with more full on vag pics - no, just no.  Hop over to STG if you want that.

All of above one man's opinion.  Carry on.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Happymon said:

Run Forrest, run!  

like the wind and do not look back

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess I forgot number 4 - full on scammer but they are usually not so dumb

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at her profile this morning and didn't see the pics with the minor child and the frontal full nudity showing her pubic area...which is a no-no on TOB.  However there is a new nude pic showing her butt and pussy lips.

Next the phone number in profile - (720) 776-6623 - has over 300 ad hits on SUMO ALL for a black trans lady.  That tells me whoever placed the ad places ads for more than one person and forgot who he was posting for or mixed up numbers - followed by the really awkward "try this number" statement on ad here.  Three possibilities when that comes up - massive coincidence that an escort just happens to get the same phone number another escort used to own, LE or pimp. I do not believe in coincidence, do you?   If this is true, she won't be on TOB very long.

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Caressa Duval said:

Not in a million years!!

Yeah, I don't mind a little bit being left to the imagination.

Also, I thought there was a VERY high bar for new ladies who wanted to join. I'd heard you need multiple references from ladies who are well established on the board. And those ladies need to put their membership on the line to sponsor a new lady. I don't know that to be true, just what I've heard. This case seems to indicate that that is not the current standard. Hard to imagine multiple, established ladies would put their careers on the line for someone with no p411, not website and no reviews.  Also just as likely that I have no idea what I'm taking about.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/21/2023 at 8:57 AM, tide32 said:

Top Notch Chloe 720-909-7925
Colorado Companion

I don't know or just can't remember, seeing a provider, posting pictures with a kid in the background before. Has anyone seen this young lady before.. https://theotherboard.com/users/164303

 

This was an accident ! I added over 50 recent selfies and had no idea a minor was in the back! It was deleted as soon as it was brought to my attention!

 

On 3/22/2023 at 0:54 PM, Mustang87 said:

Yeah, I don't mind a little bit being left to the imagination.

Also, I thought there was a VERY high bar for new ladies who wanted to join. I'd heard you need multiple references from ladies who are well established on the board. And those ladies need to put their membership on the line to sponsor a new lady. I don't know that to be true, just what I've heard. This case seems to indicate that that is not the current standard. Hard to imagine multiple, established ladies would put their careers on the line for someone with no p411, not website and no reviews.  Also just as likely that I have no idea what I'm taking about.

I have reviews now

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/22/2023 at 8:14 AM, ilovewomen said:

I looked at her profile this morning and didn't see the pics with the minor child and the frontal full nudity showing her pubic area...which is a no-no on TOB.  However there is a new nude pic showing her butt and pussy lips.

Next the phone number in profile - (720) 776-6623 - has over 300 ad hits on SUMO ALL for a black trans lady.  That tells me whoever placed the ad places ads for more than one person and forgot who he was posting for or mixed up numbers - followed by the really awkward "try this number" statement on ad here.  Three possibilities when that comes up - massive coincidence that an escort just happens to get the same phone number another escort used to own, LE or pimp. I do not believe in coincidence, do you?   If this is true, she won't be on TOB very long.

I have a texting app called TextNow. I chose area code and it gives me a random #! After a while of not using it the # is no longer yours and is giving to someone else. A lot of providers use texting apps! I am 100% a woman. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/21/2023 at 5:37 PM, gr8owl said:

This one may set a new record for most red flags in a single ad.  First off the minor in a pic?  WTF I thought new ladies were closely screened and had to have references.  Who includes THAT background in an ad pic and WHO vouches for someone that does?  And why allow it to bee posted to begin with.

Next the phone number in profile - (720) 776-6623 - has over 300 ad hits on SUMO ALL for a black trans lady.  That tells me whoever placed the ad places ads for more than one person and forgot who he was posting for or mixed up numbers - followed by the really awkward "try this number" statement on ad here.  Three possibilities when that comes up - massive coincidence that an escort just happens to get the same phone number another escort used to own, LE or pimp. I do not believe in coincidence, do you?

Lastly as far as wanting to trash the joint with more full on vag pics - no, just no.  Hop over to STG if you want that.

All of above one man's opinion.  Carry on.

I randomly put over 40 photos on my page and didn’t realize a photo with a minor was in it I was deleted fast. As for the # it is a text now app completely random!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/21/2023 at 5:46 PM, gr8owl said:

Guess I forgot number 4 - full on scammer but they are usually not so dumb

 

On 3/21/2023 at 5:37 PM, gr8owl said:

This one may set a new record for most red flags in a single ad.  First off the minor in a pic?  WTF I thought new ladies were closely screened and had to have references.  Who includes THAT background in an ad pic and WHO vouches for someone that does?  And why allow it to bee posted to begin with.

Next the phone number in profile - (720) 776-6623 - has over 300 ad hits on SUMO ALL for a black trans lady.  That tells me whoever placed the ad places ads for more than one person and forgot who he was posting for or mixed up numbers - followed by the really awkward "try this number" statement on ad here.  Three possibilities when that comes up - massive coincidence that an escort just happens to get the same phone number another escort used to own, LE or pimp. I do not believe in coincidence, do you?

Lastly as far as wanting to trash the joint with more full on vag pics - no, just no.  Hop over to STG if you want that.

All of above one man's opinion.  Carry on.

New to online websites. Didn’t know 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/23/2023 at 0:25 PM, Topnotchchloe said:

 

New to online websites. Didn’t know 

Given the same circumstances and known info at the time I would make the same comments.

Given more recent info in the form of nine positive reviews I say welcome to the board, hope you prosper. :)

And I hope you now understand why the questions were raised.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/20/2023 at 4:31 PM, gr8owl said:

Given the same circumstances and known info at the time I would make the same comments.

Given more recent info in the form of nine positive reviews I say welcome to the board, hope you prosper. :)

And I hope you now understand why the questions were raised.

I got to agree. After the positive reviews, I think I might have rushed to the wrong conclusion. But, I never said I was the brightest bulb on the tree, in my defense.  

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy it was taken care of. I am not understanding why the drama needed to be addressed publicly? Thinking more discretion should be used with addressing people privately. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Kali Sensual Reiki said:

Happy it was taken care of. I am not understanding why the drama needed to be addressed publicly? Thinking more discretion should be used with addressing people privately. 

Actually, I feel posting about it was proper. The owners, and mods have lives. They can't watch everything 24/7. I feel it was personally okay for @tide32 to make a post. If anything to alert the woman to delete that photo. Things can get into drama if you PM people. Tide did the best he could. She seems like a lovely woman, we all make mistakes. Her new photos, seriously, off the hook!

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0