Sako

411 on kittykatt

33 posts in this topic

How to check if the new TOB provider is legit?  I.e. kittykatt

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

kittykatt 720-507-3353
Colorado Escort

Hey all: I'm pretty close to pulling the trigger on seeing this gal.  I have done the research - pics are of a model in Denver, even received a confirming pic via text.  What concerns me is that she has been advertising since May and has yet to receive a review.  Any thoughts?  Anyone seen her and just not gotten around to leaving a review?  I've really delved deep and haven't found anything fishy, but there's still something causing me to hesitate...

 

https://theotherboard.com/users/117710

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike 970, a pic in the text could mean nothing more than she had a saved image on her phone, it does not necessarily mean she was the person in the pic. Unless she show you a live video like facetime to prove. If you google the pics in her ad, you would find that all the pics belong to a local model - Desirae Lynn Ferguson. However there is still a small chance that Desirae and Kittykatt are the same person, it is your call. Please let us know what you find out.

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, ceeu2nite, I appreciate the responses.  I found her on a few different social media and modeling sites as well - even cross referenced what she told me about her incall with public records before I started feeling a bit creepy...  I could not find any of the typical red flags.  I attached the pic she sent me - it was sent via some sort of web app which time-stamped it as being from right before I received it, and a google/tinyeye search didn't come up with any matching hits, so... Looking pretty good.  

I declined to TOFTT tonight because I was busy with other things, but I hope to go for it soon.  She says she's out of DTC, so hopefully someone closer can check into seeing her, too.

desiraelynnferguson3034987289 7205073353.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A model moonlighting as an escort ??? Not exactly a first. Can't find any red flags...go for it. If its not the girl in the photos answering the door...walk.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, ceeu2nite said:

Mike 970, a pic in the text could mean nothing more than she had a saved image on her phone, it does not necessarily mean she was the person in the pic. Unless she show you a live video like facetime to prove. If you google the pics in her ad, you would find that all the pics belong to a local model - Desirae Lynn Ferguson. However there is still a small chance that Desirae and Kittykatt are the same person, it is your call. Please let us know what you find out.

 

Totally agree about the pics, they can be easily faked and so can the "time stamps".  I also want to warn everyone that, contrary to popular opinion, videos can be completely faked as well. The best you can do is do the research and (as many of the YL's here remind each other) trust your gut, for your own protection.

For reference, I have been in the IT and Software Development industry for the last 30 years.  Trust me, the only thing that can't be faked is a face-to-face meeting.  

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CountryGentleman said:

...  Trust me, the only thing that can't be faked is a face-to-face meeting.  

There have been times when I thought she phoned that in too! 🙀

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike970. Thanks for TOFTT. I too am interested and have been watch for a review to show up. I have not had the time to do as much due diligence as you, so I think I will be relying on your feedback! I would be very interested in knowing how things turn out! 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CountryGentleman said:

 Trust me, the only thing that can't be faked is a face-to-face meeting.  

   Exactly...thats why one walks away when fake pix are being used.

 that said,if she is the real model moonlighting....won't you kick yourself if you find that out AFTER she retires ??

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank u all for info.  I almost pull a trigger myself but thought to check for safety first. 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aww, jeeze, didn't any of you guys pull the trigger?  Come on youngsters, TOFTT.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BadBoy said:

Aww, jeeze, didn't any of you guys pull the trigger?  Come on youngsters, TOFTT.

   hey...didn't you say you were going first ?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry gents, after more research, I have a theory that I cannot necessarily prove, but it has shifted my gut all the way around to avoiding this one.  I believe that Lexi/Alexa (http://colorado.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/alexa-back-denver/32352922, 720-502-8949 and 720-316-9571) and KittyKatt are in cahoots and that KittKatt is actually the blond shown in the pictures here: http://www.escortphonelookup.com/720-316-9571/?id=31776772.

 

They used the same number at one point in time.  Lexi has one decent TER review (https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=320643), but Kitty does not.  The gal in the archived pics isn't too far off from the model pics, but far enough to easily tell they aren't one in the same.  For that reason, my gut tells me it's a no-go.  If someone else TOFTT and I am wrong, bless you!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

1 hour ago, coloradoguy75 said:

Hey Mike970

Looks like she got a review? https://theotherboard.com/users/117710  Reviewer says the pics are old? Interesting, given she is only 25.

 

         Maybe they are from when she was 18 ???  He does say that she is smoking hot. Maybe she got ink after the pix she is using were taken.

Edited by JRWolfe
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/23/2017 at 1:13 PM, Mike970 said:

Lexi has one decent TER review (https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=320643), but Kitty does not.  

I've met the aforementioned Lexi and it was essentially a rip-off, while I was kind and reviewed with a So-So. This group/agency seem to be really smart with fantastic looking pictures, which could be real based on my experience. But service and attitude are almost certain to be poor. Better avoided.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not saying pics are fake, or Kitty is KittKatt, but, definitely lots of misdirection going on and Raul-'s advice is solid.

Ceeu2nite's link has a different number and same pics, which Googling the number turns up the following link.

http://callescort.org/720-502-8019

Scroll through the pics there, eventually turn up a brunette! Google Image those pics, turn up several ads, which look like two different brunettes:

http://denver.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/healing-hands-and-a-sensual-mouth/41086758

http://cheeposlist.com.denver.hoxnif.com/bonus/post/22805260/

And yet a new number, 720-307-0360

One of the hits on the brunette pics in Google Image is for a Backpage ad. When you click on that hit, the brunette's former ad has now morphed (TM Boink) into the blonde of this thread. And another number: 720-466-8499

http://denver.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/blonde-bomshell-no-limit-freaky-side-2-girl-available/40169953

Guessing these other numbers are going turn into a deeper rabbit hole.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Well, on the bright side..they are hot pictures.But yes..the spidey sense is tingling . Hmm, could one of her reviews be a selfie ? Only boink knows for sure. 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, NoCoGeezer said:

The following link from my previous post, is of DDMolly on this board. The picture of the woman kneeling in the chair is the one that turned up the hits.

http://denver.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/healing-hands-and-a-sensual-mouth/41086758

https://theotherboard.com/escort-ads/region/3/colorado-all?page=8

(knew the woman looked familiar)

  Don't you just love it when the girls say that they have NO tattoos...yet the pictures show that they do have them 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

  Don't you just love it when the girls say that they have NO tattoos...yet the pictures show that they do have them 

And when the ad says no driver, yet review says she has a driver.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't waste your time. I recently answered one of Molly's ads with no joy. A girl named Angela replied. Definitely NOT Molly.  Can you spell U-P-S-E-L-L ??? Wow - I mean astronomical upsell. No recommendation from me.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Goddamn! What a tangle of misdirection and deceit! First Lexi, then Kitty (with green-ish blue hair), then Svetlana Lickanova and now all the ladies in the ads linked in this thread. All with drool-worthy photos. I've been guilty of thinking with little head far too often than I like to admit but this makes it so much harder. AVOID!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A ton of good research, lots of correct interpretations, some incorrect interpretations. Kitty, Molly, Dez, Lexi, and several others. Yes some misleading info and photos, some management mistakes,   Reviews are genuine, wherever they are at, one person's character (UPSELL), leading to a bad name and avoidance to others. Let's get the facts straight, let's get the real, and let's perhaps truly inform ourselves and put this thread to rest. Ask any questions, feel free. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sweet sensations said:

A ton of good research, lots of correct interpretations, some incorrect interpretations. Kitty, Molly, Dez, Lexi, and several others. Yes some misleading info and photos, some management mistakes,   Reviews are genuine, wherever they are at, one person's character (UPSELL), leading to a bad name and avoidance to others. Let's get the facts straight, let's get the real, and let's perhaps truly inform ourselves and put this thread to rest. Ask any questions, feel free. 

Just how would you know that?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sweet sensations said:

A ton of good research, lots of correct interpretations, some incorrect interpretations. Kitty, Molly, Dez, Lexi, and several others. Yes some misleading info and photos, some management mistakes,   Reviews are genuine, wherever they are at, one person's character (UPSELL), leading to a bad name and avoidance to others. Let's get the facts straight, let's get the real, and let's perhaps truly inform ourselves and put this thread to rest. Ask any questions, feel free. 

 Hmm..its becoming obvious they work for you. Are you getting the hint that misleading pictures and info = business going downhill ?? Once burned,the word does get around.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PM me for any info. I'd be glad to respond with the MY FACTS... (basically that my wallet is lighter and I'm not smiling)

deadhorse.gif

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now