Anyone seen "angelica rayne"

[Guest]

Angelica rayne 719-415-5286
Colorado Escort

http://denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/brand-new-super-spinner-sweetandpetite-the-perfect-little-treat/24396650

 

 

I did a search and only her ads here show up. Im about to pull the trigger hoping someone has info

 

 

_______________________________________________________cached Ad

cached Ad BP Denver escorts July 16, 2016 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:cdhI0x9W8_0J:denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/brand-new-super-spinner-sweetandpetite-the-perfect-little-treat/24396650+&cd=19&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

cached Ad BP Denver escorts July 13, 2016   http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xxEKkzKPTDgJ:denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/dont-be-insane-choose-angelica-raynebrand-new-spinner-trust-me-not-a-beginner2girl-out-spec/24396650+&cd=20&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Edited July 17, 2016 by Kaduk
Added Tags, proper phone # xxx-xxx-xxxx structure cached version

[Kaduk]

Same picture set

• cached Ad Dallas escorts June 27, 2016 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:cjHggUHZnDcJ:dallas.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/exquisite-treat-cant-be-beat-magnificent-monday-madness-addiction-noticeoutcall-specials/43033235+&cd=16&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=u
  • 281-317-7096 Belaire Sinclair
  • cached Ad Denver  July 14, 2016 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zAbLt5gw6AsJ:denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/outcalloutcalllet-me-ease-your-mind/24377975+&cd=17&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
    • 719-717-1707  Belaire Sinclair [ the different phone number that shows in the OP BP Ad ] different pictures

[gr8owl]

And the Belaire Sinclair ads claim p411 - but there is no one by that name on P 411.

Her ad here has the email of a guy!

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:iYL2A_C4fDgJ:backpage.com.sanantonio.hoxnif.com/bonus/post/16529295/+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

And the angelica ads she can't decide if she is 18,19, or 20.  The pics - 90lbs?? Yeah right.

I would run like hell.  But if you go this should make for an interesting review.

[Guest]

I guess I'm a glutton for punishment but I went and saw her anyway all I can say is yes. Pm for details. I hope we can get her to stick around for a while

[Kaduk]

6 minutes ago, corrado said:

I guess I'm a glutton for punishment but I went and saw her anyway all I can say is yes. Pm for details. I hope we can get her to stick around for a while

What about the discrepancy's on; Name, Numbers, borrowed images along with no P411 info found?

[pfunk]

2 hours ago, corrado said:

 Pm for details. 

Why not post a review, and yourself save answering numerous emails?

[Buddy Glass]

Talked to her the other day, and she said this girl would be her reference. And that girl checked out fine. I just didn't end up having the time to see her. 

[Guest]

I dont know about the discrepancies but she was like 90 lbs but only 4 11 or 5 0 feet. Super spinner

Edited July 18, 2016 by corrado
Clarification

[gr8owl]

Sometimes you just don't know for sure until you go in person .... regardless of red flags, warning signs ...... OR good reviews.  Knowledge is only advanced when little head forges ahead!! LOL

[Kaduk]

Same picture set.

• cached Ad Denver  July 14, 2016 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zAbLt5gw6AsJ:denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/outcalloutcalllet-me-ease-your-mind/24377975+&cd=17&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
  • 719-717-1707  Belaire Sinclair
• cached Ad BP Miami escorts July 17, 2016   http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5CxoEJWCaTMJ:miami.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hi-gentlemen-im-megan/35697371+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
• Megan 305-414-0648

[ajot]

Ran across this post for her a few days ago: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1058404942#post1058404942

And somewhere it looked like the linked ref was doing doubles with her.

20 hours ago, Buddy Glass said:

Talked to her the other day, and she said this girl would be her reference. And that girl checked out fine. I just didn't end up having the time to see her. 

Someone just posted a review on eccie, but I'm not a premium member now so I don't see the details. I did see her just come up on p411 the other night I think? 

So definitely seems more legit than the scams out there. No personal experience with her, but seems just like a provider new to the area vs the normal fluff on bp. Hopefully we see more of her though!

[Kaduk]

2 hours ago, ajot said:

Ran across this post for her a few days ago: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1058404942#post1058404942

And somewhere it looked like the linked ref was doing doubles with her.

Someone just posted a review on eccie, but I'm not a premium member now so I don't see the details. I did see her just come up on p411 the other night I think? 

So definitely seems more legit than the scams out there. No personal experience with her, but seems just like a provider new to the area vs the normal fluff on bp. Hopefully we see more of her though!

Look at the name, the review date http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1778466 then the OP's 411 posting date...

 

[Buddy Glass]

4 hours ago, ajot said:

Ran across this post for her a few days ago: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1058404942#post1058404942

And somewhere it looked like the linked ref was doing doubles with her.

Someone just posted a review on eccie, but I'm not a premium member now so I don't see the details. I did see her just come up on p411 the other night I think? 

So definitely seems more legit than the scams out there. No personal experience with her, but seems just like a provider new to the area vs the normal fluff on bp. Hopefully we see more of her though!

Kaduk is the master of this research thing. Dude posted here is the same one that posted that review over a month before being a 'glutton for punishment'. 

I don't know that it's a scam, but it's shady enough for me to stay away. Too many other options out there that don't have as much drama to sift through. 

[pfunk]

10 hours ago, Buddy Glass said:

Kaduk is the master of this research thing. Dude posted here is the same one that posted that review over a month before being a 'glutton for punishment'. 

I don't know that it's a scam, but it's shady enough for me to stay away. Too many other options out there that don't have as much drama to sift through. 

Although the review shows a date of 6/17, it was posted yesterday. I think he simply put the wrong date in the form. Just a guess. 

[Guest]

Yep wrong date

[Kaduk]

 

1 hour ago, pfunk said:

Although the review shows a date of 6/17, it was posted yesterday. I think he simply put the wrong date in the form. Just a guess. 

2 minutes ago, corrado said:

Yep wrong date

I figured as much; will give you a pass on this one, shit happens....

[Kinkster]

Saw her last night, doubles incall visit with Brooklyn Sky. Angelica has amazing pierced tits.[ snip ]  young spinner. Everything covered. Will review when I get a few minutes.

Edited July 20, 2016 by Kaduk
thumbs up

[Kinkster]

The edit to my post & warning I received are disappointing. So much for trying to contribute info to the community. Will not make that mistake again.

[N6_in_the_village]

On 7/17/2016 at 5:16 PM, Kaduk said:

Same picture set

• cached Ad Dallas escorts June 27, 2016 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:cjHggUHZnDcJ:dallas.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/exquisite-treat-cant-be-beat-magnificent-monday-madness-addiction-noticeoutcall-specials/43033235+&cd=16&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=u
  • 281-317-7096 Belaire Sinclair
  • cached Ad Denver  July 14, 2016 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zAbLt5gw6AsJ:denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/outcalloutcalllet-me-ease-your-mind/24377975+&cd=17&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
    • 719-717-1707  Belaire Sinclair [ the different phone number that shows in the OP BP Ad ] different pictures

 

Hi Kaduk, I know you put a lot of work into researching these cached links, which last much longer than the original Backpage ads, but the information in the first two posts in this thread was presented in a confusing way.  Looking at the four cached links (two links in your addition to Corrado's post and two more in your follow-up post) in order of Backpage posting date:

On June 27, "Bellaire Sinclair" posted a BP ad in Dallas, for herself only, with area code 281 (Houston) phone number.

On July 13, Bellaire Sinclair and another girl Angelica Rayne posted an ad in Denver, with pictures for each girl, and two phone numbers, both with area code 719.  The pictures of Bellaire Sinclair are the same in the June 27 and July 13 ads.

On July 14, Bellaire Sinclair posted an ad in Denver for herself only, with a new picture set showing (someone's) face clearly, and the same phone number as the July 13 ad.

On July 16, Bellaire Sinclair and Angelica Rayne posted an ad in Denver, almost identical to the July 13 ad, except the pictures of Bellair Sinclair are left out, only Angelica Rayne shown.

In other words, I don't see any "identity confusion" in these ads (two ads on different dates with the same phone number but different names / descriptions / photos would be "identity confusion"), or anything else suspicious.  It is not unusual for an escort to change phone number when moving between cities (June 27 to July 13), or to use different photo sets in different ads (July 13 to July 14), or post some solo ads (June 27, July 14) and some doubles ads with a second girl (July 13, July 16).

 

 

Edited July 20, 2016 by N6_in_the_village
correct references to earlier posts

[N6_in_the_village]

On 7/17/2016 at 6:20 PM, Kaduk said:

What about the discrepancy's on; Name, Numbers, borrowed images along with no P411 info found?

Kaduk, as you can see, I looked carefully at the four cached Backpage ads (in the first two posts), and did not find any discrepancies.  When comparing a "doubles" ad for two girls, and then "solo" ads for either of those girls, a little extra time is needed to examine the information before saying there is a discrepancy.

These escorts are not well-known in our community - but if they were regular TOB posters who sometimes worked together and posted "doubles" ads, and sometimes posted "solo" ads, I expect they would be annoyed if you said something was wrong just because you were too hasty in comparing the various ads.

 

[N6_in_the_village]

Further follow-up: I agree that the pictures in the July 14 Belaire Sinclair ad are somewhat suspicious, because they look a lot different than the pictures of her in the other ads.  Maybe those pics are "borrowed", but more links are needed to show that.

[N6_in_the_village]

Ahh, now I see Kaduk's post that shows the pictures in the July 14 Bellaire Sinclair ad are the same as for Megan, 305-414-0648, Miami Beach, July 19 so clearly "borrowed".  I wouldn't be surprised if these are pics of some model that show up in a lot of BP ads.  Why do these girls make us do so much work to check out their information?

Edited July 20, 2016 by N6_in_the_village

[fred1964]

3 hours ago, Kinkster said:

The edit to my post & warning I received are disappointing. So much for trying to contribute info to the community. Will not make that mistake again.

From the rules

Note to Gentlemen:
No Shilling in the forum: Posting an unsolicited endorsement for a provider. this includes posting a link to her reviews, web site, ad or profile. you can only post this type of information if another member has ask for it.
Your signature may not contain links to any adult orientated website. No other information that could be considered advertising or self promotion is permitted in your signature or in posts Tag's & in your forum Profile. You may upload your picture to use as your avatar only.
Also; It's OK to give a simple thumbs up or down in a reply to a 411 provider request, just don't go into detail as that would be Review material and/or shilling & not allowed.

[Bit Banger]

6 hours ago, Kinkster said:

Saw her last night, doubles incall visit with Brooklyn Sky. Angelica has amazing pierced tits.[ snip ]  young spinner. Everything covered. Will review when I get a few minutes.

What Fred said!

[Kaduk]

46 minutes ago, fred1964 said:

From the rules

Note to Gentlemen:
No Shilling in the forum: Posting an unsolicited endorsement for a provider. this includes posting a link to her reviews, web site, ad or profile. you can only post this type of information if another member has ask for it.
Your signature may not contain links to any adult orientated website. No other information that could be considered advertising or self promotion is permitted in your signature or in posts Tag's & in your forum Profile. You may upload your picture to use as your avatar only.
Also; It's OK to give a simple thumbs up or down in a reply to a 411 provider request, just don't go into detail as that would be Review material and/or shilling & not allowed.

 

38 minutes ago, Bit Banger said:

What Fred said!

This is the message sent;

Note for member

If you received a warning notice please understand that we don't think you are "bad". Most times you will receive a Friendly Reminder a zero point warning, which is just a heads up and please don’t feel overwhelmed when they are sent to you.

Your post falls on the side of Review material in the Forum which is not allowed;

A basic thumps up or down is perfectly fine.

I will need to edit the review info out of the post.

 

Again  just a friendly reminder

Thank you for choosing and posting on TOB

______________________________________________________________________

The way the system is set up---> is to send a reminder which arrives as a warning to the member. I apologize that it shows as a warning. I had shown this in bold---> Friendly Reminder  which is just a heads up. To further emphasize that its a reminder only.

again thanks everyone for contributing to the forum.....