Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest Yasusuke

Vanecia on bp

8 posts in this topic

Vanecia: 702-684-2129

2 of the photos are traced to different Naughty Review sites. Those phone numbers are traced back to multiple other adds.

Lot's of cautionary things on this one.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you did a google image search on her pics you would know right away that you will not get the girl in the pictures. Are you guys noobs or just don't know how to do these things. And tineye is not as good as google image search.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1 re: Google Image search.

As pointed out, would turn up the pictures being used all over the country by different hookers.

And would find out the girl in the pictures is some porn model from FL named "Molly Cavalli".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+1 re: Google Image search.

As pointed out, would turn up the pictures being used all over the country by different hookers.

And would find out the girl in the pictures is some porn model from FL named "Molly Cavalli".

702-684-2129 Vanecia

Edited by Kaduk
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
+1 re: Google Image search.

As pointed out, would turn up the pictures being used all over the country by different hookers.

And would find out the girl in the pictures is some porn model from FL named "Molly Cavalli".

If you did a google image search on her pics you would know right away that you will not get the girl in the pictures. Are you guys noobs or just don't know how to do these things. And tineye is not as good as google image search.

But, the gal behind the door may be as good looking or acceptable as the one in the ads.

You need to be prepared to walk if it doesn't look/feel right.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But, the gal behind the door may be as good looking or acceptable as the one in the ads.

True, however, if she's that good looking, why can't she use actual Photoshopped (to get rid of telling tats etc.) body-only shots, if she's going to pull the "no face due to privacy" angle?

But, usually, nowhere close to the girl in the ad: scammer hooking in guys expecting to see the girl in the photos and usually not enough balls to walk when walking into scam.

Bottom line: scammers whores not deserving White Knight "protection".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True, however, if she's that good looking, why can't she use actual Photoshopped (to get rid of telling tats etc.) body-only shots, if she's going to pull the "no face due to privacy" angle?

But, usually, nowhere close to the girl in the ad: scammer hooking in guys expecting to see the girl in the photos and usually not enough balls to walk when walking into scam.

Bottom line: scammers whores not deserving White Knight "protection".

But, the gal behind the door may be as good looking or acceptable as the one in the ads.

You need to be prepared to walk if it doesn't look/feel right.

If you are not prepared to walk, don't make the call. ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0