Dweller201

That sounds interesting, especially if you're a local person looking for regulars. It humanizes you. Meanwhile, I'm a fitness freak but a couple of years ago I couldn't get rid of fat that I wanted gone. That's because I was a vegetarian, and I didn't know it, but allergic to gluten, which was a huge part of my diet. Shortly ago, I started eating meat, increased my protein a lot, cut carbs/gluten, and now I'm lean getting to very lean and muscular. Try a high protein diet for amazing results!

You seem to be in a good position to answer, so why not?

I've had two, and maybe three, gfs who were virgins. I never ask about a woman's sexual past and that's why there's the "maybe" but I knew that two were. I tend to attract inexperienced women because I have a pleasant personality and they think I will be a nice person to have sex with. That is true, but I like sex a lot and I kind of hate giving direction or even thinking during sex. So, all of these women made me tense and annoyed because they didn't know how to give a BJ, for instance. Also, they seemed to think that my penis needed to be touched like it was some kind of precious glass art object. That result in me saying things like "suck it, like hard, don't just put it in your mouth," and so on. I hate that because it's like being in some BDSM movie. Another problem was that my one GF would get so excited she'd cum instantly. But, she wasn't the multiple orgasm type and her vagina would get dry, tight, and painful. Thus, I couldn't have a vaginal orgasm with her, which is what I like. I had to teach her to hang in there and not cum so fast. I kinda felt like a woman dealing with a guy with her, she'd even fall asleep immediately!! I prefer women who know what they're doing. I saw a provider here who knew how to give a great bj and I was like, THANK GOD!

No she is not. I've known lots of women who do that while at the movies, eating, and lots more. It's some kind of inability to be in the moment, and is sad/annoying.

No that was with random women over the course of my life. It happened when I was younger with younger women. I think it has to do with women who have trouble getting aroused and so sex is like something happening to them, so they can sit back and think about whatever. All of these girls were pretty smart, which is the type of woman I like. Some such people can't shut themselves off and relax. Also, if a person has <snip-forbidden topic> and starts talking to me about that subject it kills my interest. I don't want to talk about that subject during sex.

The option of seeing what my partner sees, does not sound appealing. I'm not all that turned on my me, but thanks.

Oh man, I've had multiple women do stuff like that. I listen when people are talking and any serious comments take me right out of sexual mode and into analytical mode. I don't even like listening to music because I start thinking about the lyrics.

Let's get our credentials bro!

I've been curious about that but haven't researched the laws. I'll bet though that you need some kind of license to film in order to claim you're a pornographer. That would be an amusing thing to get if I'm right.

It's amazing to me that it hasn't been challenged. Legally, porn is a "artform" which is why it's not prostitution, even though it is. But, the law sees it as art, so porn is a performance art, and I don't see how a law can be made to make artists wear or do a certain thing.

Yep, it's a good question. Why AMPs I wonder? I can't picture it.

My point was that you aren't going to find free hetero glory holes and I know of no setup where you can find that kind of scene paid or not. If you're a male homosexual, you can find that scene for free and in plenitude all over the place. Another poster mentioned that some escorts provide the situation but to me that's like a play vs a real life situation. It's not my fantasy, so whatever works!

Actually, I'm an expert on the history of psychology and the word "fetish" means "useless" because fetishes are seen as a useless activity. The same goes for a "magic" item. Example: The voodoo priest waved his fetish (stick, etc) through the air to cure the sick man. From a science perspective, that stick is useless, it doesn't cure anything. I'm pretty sure that a doctor named Kraft-Ebing (look him up) applied to term "fetish" to focused non-procreative sexual obsessions. He coined the term "masochist" (named after a poet) and many other terms we use today. In the sexual sense, fetishes were seen as useless obsessions that distract from forming meaningful sexual relationships. People with fetishes tend to objectify humans and aren't people focused so fetishes were seen as a mental problem. The origin of a fetish is a secret desire to not bond with others. So, the concern was that the fetishist would never develop a family life and die alone. An example would be a guy who only likes "feet" and rates people by feet related criteria. He sees people as living feet and does not see them as personalities. Thus, he never connects with real people and can easily dismiss other humans based on the extremely shallow idea that they are feet only. Men and women do this to each other all the time. Pennsylvania: Since moving here, I have seen none of the gay activity I mentioned in CO. But whatever the case, the glory hole culture is strong there and it has nothing to do with women.

No, I think it's the way a lot of gay male sex plays out. I'm from PA and there were hordes of gays who hung out in mall bathrooms, roadside rests, and porn shops. That's like a "normal" way for them to have casual sex. Meanwhile, a "fetish" (by definition) is a meaningless little quirk held by the person. So, you saw hetero "glory hole" porn, you want to do it to get it out of your system, and it's a little bit of nothing. It's not a lifestyle type of thing. That's what I meant. The glory hole thing is a gay male activity and not something heteros have ever done. But porn introduced it as a fantasy and now it's a fetish/fantasy for heteros.

I see. That's more a "fetish" activity done in private than a "place that has glory holes" and is unpredictable. Anyway, thanks for the info.

Is that such a thing? From what I know, they're a gay male thing in porn stores, etc. I don't think any woman is going to settle for that business.

I hate condoms. By the time I did all of that I'd be leaving to go watch TV.

She looks like she needs help. The second photo down on the right has looking unhealthy and prematurely aged from too much of something. I'm sure her whole crew is in a downward spiral.

I can see Marie Osmond. There's a lot of money to be made with fans who grew up in the 70s.

She is very good looking. Be right over!

Yes, they have the right. In my experience, most people find a WIDE range of other humans to be gross. It's amazing most providers can see the variety of men they do. If you think race X looks repulsive or you can't take ultra fat people, then you need to give yourself a break and not see them, so you don't traumatize yourself.

I got David Beckham! I look like him in my core features but I'm more heavily featured.

Trying to make Denver a safer place... How hypocritical. Since I moved to Denver, I've never met more drunks and druggies running around the streets. What's the danger level there compared to a guy who wants a BJ in a quiet hotel room?

I think it's awesome. I predicted when I was in high school that substance and prostitution laws would be defeated because they're illogical and do more harm than good. It seems to be coming to pass and it will be good. If only the US was more on top of it.

That makes sense, but then it would be too hard to find on the net.