urfan

where's the rest of the review?

that's right, boys, it's the 438th anniversary of English physician William Harvey's 'discovery' of blood circulation and the first explanation of that light-headed feeling you get when reaching climax.

before the inevitable "oh no, not this shit again" d.b. post appears, allow me to clarify from the 'Posting Rules' for Colo and others' edification: 2. Do not use the board to shill or provide unsolicited endorsements. the operative word being 'unsolicited' here. Ride asks a legitimate question, so any suggestions would not be unsolicited. i think shilling is fairly straight-forward (they don't want pimps/boyfriends using discussion posts to promote a particular provider. so in that spirit, let me suggest that i've heard good things about (in no particular order) Luce Kytten, Megan Kush and Elle St. Lovelle for starters. you also might try logging into chat and see if anybody there can help you. now get busy - and don't forget to write a review.

sage words from the 'bitch is just a sperm repository i pay to make my deposit' school of happy hobbying

First off, Barbie, any girl who can channel Camus like you is all right in my book. like others, i'm also mystified by skater . . and strangely intrigued. having more lively, fun and light-hearted here will be welcome relief all right. the term 'renaissance man' is tossed around so lightly these days but i welcome a fellow traveler with a point of view and the ability to express it in complete sentences.

don't pay too much nevermind to them nay-sayers, Knock you jest don't ever know what you're gonna find out there - inside or outside of tob. anything's possible. and besides, what's a hobby horse to do if'n he don't have them 'true love' feelings fer the s.o. no more?

huh, interesting bit of research there La P unlike you tho, i recognize myself as having been at one time or another every 'type' except the juvenile or opportunist . . . and stalker of course - well kind of

wow, i ain't seen such pot-stirrin since 2big in his prime

took the words right out of my mouth.

i thought self-shilling was against da rules

2 a : a favorable or unfavorable event or situation that occurs by chance : a fluctuation of state or condition <the vicissitudes of daily life> b : a difficulty or hardship attendant on a way of life, a career, or a course of action and usually beyond one's control c : alternating change : succession hmm, when i read the op i immediately jumped to definitions 2a, b and 2c so i took the question differently. all depends on what your definition of 'it' is i guess. was the chance occurrence perhaps a deflated . . . ego. also, i figured 'it' was her telling him what a drag it is to be a hooker. and by 'succession' i took that to mean her 3:00 is circling the parking lot. besides, vicissitude sounds too much like vasectomy what was the question again?

you callow vermin, how dare you besmirch the good name of an adult actress and dancer? to paraphrase another recent post here (warts and all): "Again how do you think these adult actresses/dancers, there family and friends feel when they google their name and find them selves on a hooker/john board? This fors mms ot belong on thi s board.

the knee-jerk answer would be, of course, open-legged, open-mouthed and possibly even open to the Grecian adventure.

kinda like this here?

i don't know about the dragonfang thing, but boomer's seems to be operational, just not very crowded

hey Sharkey, this is a good topic to post, despite the caterwauling. take heart, plenty of guys have gone through similar experiences as you're describing. it's sometimes the inevitable downside of engaging in this activity. now, here's a modest proposal: get one of them blow-up dolls, fill it with warm pudding and have at it. that way, you can avoid asps of any service level altogether. you save tons of money on the financial transaction side and still get your nut without the emotional investment (or dividend) that otherwise accompanies The Deed. <derisive font off>

baah, she jes never met ME

all i can post in response to this thread is:

yep, that dang creepin' socialist nannyism strikes again, thanks to the EEC. looks like the godless heathens now say 'nyet' to decadent, frilly unmentionables under the proletarian sackcloth outfits. which led to women protesting and wearing underwear on their heads, shouting "Freedom to panties." also film at 11:00 of the inevitable looting and a run on stockings. could this be the final straw that breaks the cameltoe's back? Trade ban will outlaw certain lacy underwear in Russia http://www.aol.com/article/2014/02/18/trade-ban-will-outlaw-certain-lacy-underwear-in-russia/20832503/?ncid=webmail8#!slide=2435743 spoiler alert for the tldr crowd - the salient quote: "As a rule, lacy underwear ... is literally snatched off the shelves,"

maybe the Joan Jett? i'd bang them bangs

oh Dwell, where to begin. for some time now, Russia has had both the world's highest divorce and abortion rates, and much higher than the U.S. So WE are certainly not leading THEM into the moral abyss by allowing women to wear that slinky seductive synthetic slutwear the gals all seem to be clamoring for. and i don't know how many Russians you're personally acquainted with (or Georgians or Estonians, Uranians ...), but i have known plenty. misogynistic vodka-swilling racist motherfuckers almost to a man - think rednecks with different accents. but back to the panties . . .

oh brother, 'Russian news sources' reporting resurgence of religion vis-a-vis slavic feminism? Orwellian porn as opiate of the masses and comrade Vladimir data-mining American depravity to help ID and round up their hooligans? i'm jest tawkin panties here, man

sorry, pervs, no crotch shots of barely-legal ice dancers but in honor of Valentine's Day i present here, in no particular order: a nice spinner she can curl up next to me anytime this Swiss miss makes me forget all about Lindsey Vonn or her two words: Finland goalie and finally, this is just a kick-ass picture http://dy.snimg.com/story-image/5/28/4564460/210550-0-600.jpg

i couldn't quite make out that last sentence, naught but i don't think the treatment the woman athletes got here was anything (with few exceptions) vulgar, crude or disparaging. you talk like a hooker board is a bad thing. and a bit +1 to you h3 on your sentiment there for sure

+1 nusa - always the man to guide us through the murky waters of the t.o.b. shibboleths