BoobLoverJoshua

Posting something online doesn't make it public domain. Not in the least -- unless you are using the term differently (perhaps a more proper phrasing would be "publicly accessible). But most likely what's wrong with fake pics in those ads is copyright violation. I guess misrepresentation or fraud could be argued too but eh...

Indeed they are illegal in both the counties Vegas and Reno are in.

I've been to a few of them of them but actually partook in only two of them, though neither were in Pahrump, but rather a little north of Vegas. In general, you will not get GFE. There is no kissing on the lips and many (most?) won't even do DATY. Prices are also pretty high, the first one wanted $250 for "a little bit of blow job and a little bit of sex". The second one was better -- that place actually had a flat rate, which I'm told is technically illegal but,....it was there. $200 for 40 minutes IIRC with higher tiers at cheaper per hour prices, etc. Of the five I've been to, three of them had you sit in a pretty dark room and decide what girl you want -- this is the kicker. It's dark enough that she will look better than she will when you get back to the room. One of them had some real dogs, as it were. The second one I partook of with a cute Japanese girl, but I knew going in what she was like as they were listed on the website. So in summery....it's complete legal but in no way comparable to the escort scene in what you will be able to get.

Indeed, hell, just think of the death machines people are in almost every day going at 65 miles per hour next to a bunch of other death machines.

I have to boggle at all the homophobia in this thread. It makes me wonder if some of you don't watch porn because there's plenty of naked male there... Though personally I wouldn't want this, if simply because I'd prefer to be the focus of attention. If it's for free/small rate where it's not an actual escort situation sure, but if I'm paying a decent amount of money to see someone, I want the whole package...

Of course it's not actually cheating if there's an agreement that it's not exclusive...

Note that article is from 2010. Wikipedia suggests that no one has ever actually gotten one.

You know...I saw this as a single person but....why don't you guys TALK to your wives about all these issues?

It's also quite possible that any time you get into a car or bus you'll get into a bad accident and get heavily injured or die. Now while it's true that getting to places is a pretty imoportant thing where oral sex isn't, life is all one big gamble in everything isn't it?

Eh....you know a long time ago I read about how there tended to be a 10 to 1 ratio of lurkers vs posters, though this was relating to usenet. While I'm sure it in reality varies widely, especially with how easy something is to register and if one is required to register to read at all, I have to imagine that holds up. Hell, if you look here, there's currently 269 "guests" reading vs 19 "members", and a total of 5,571 "members". Now surely that that number includes many people who never actually read this place actively, but you can be sure just from those simple numbers that there's quite a large percentage of people who "only reads and profits from the reviews". Now if that 'should' be or not, I'm not going to argue because it's a futile thing that's just an opinion anyway, but one really needs to consider, ESPECIALLY on a board like this, that people have many reasons not to beyond simple leeching.

First of all, while a barber couldn't advertise "no red-haired men", they ARE allowed to refuse service to anyone. A public business doesn't have to serve you just because you walk in (though I'm not sure of the specifics of if there needs to be a jusitfiable reason or not). However, the biggest difference here is that escorts are self-employed. They are choosing who they will do business with. There is NOTHING wrong with screening clients, and putting forth that a client has to be X in the first place or they will get rejected is simply making it easier on everyone, is it not?

I'd love to be enlightened on why people want the CIM part so much...

In essence, you're paying a premium for it being legal. Since the large majority of them won't do any 'fluid exchange' (kissing especially, DATY for many, etc) and the fact that they keep you in a dark room when you choose the ladies....well it all adds up to 'why bother?'

Hobbyshop is real. The one time I partook, the girl looked basically like her photo but of course the ones on the site are indeed doctored a little -- nothing major at least for the one I did.

Pretty much par for the course at all swinger's clubs.

Well if you have something to talk about OP...start it up...

TinEye is good. Even better is using the image search in Google -- click on the images tab and click the little camera, then paste the URL of the pic.

As far as I know, NONE of them do kissing of any kind, nor BBBJ. I did DATY with one at Shady Ladies, but I inquired via email to a couple at another place (Angel's I think) and they gave it a no saying "no fluids may be exchanged" Poster above me must have gotten lucky to find one who'd kiss anyway... But yeah, it's really not a good deal -- plus you have to actually get all the way out there. Now of course, it's completely legal so there's that, but...

There was an escort in Vegas a couple years ago that didn't have a pic because she was afraid of certain people finding out. She actually got very good reviews, though, and was indeed a looker. It was a side thing for her so I doubt she minded the business she did lose...

Technically the term doesn't mean it in such a literal view, but rather simply 'Pornographic film actor'. I imagine the criteria for this was "appears in a commercially produced movie".

That's about average across the Internet, as a whole, so it's really not something to be concerned about.

Not if you do even a minimum of research. Anything higher than $400 an hour for a really hot GFE....and many can be had for less, sometimes a good deal less. The only real reason people go (ourside of truckers, etc, who travel) is the legality and the fact that people know about it -- a LOT of people think that "prostitute = street walker" and have no inkling of anything else (i.e. escorting), so they think this is the only possible option. The ones nearest Vegas -- and by 'near' it's a good hour or more, depending -- charge a huge amount. You aren't likely to get much for even $300 (and of course you never get kissing or BBBJs). I went to the one a bit further out and was able to talk the lady down to $200 (really $250 because they charged a surcharge for credit card use) for "a little of blow job and a little bit of sex", I think our time was about 15 minutes. You can go to the about twice as far as THAT (almost two hours from the strip) and get $200 for 40 minutes....but even then it's easy enough to find MANY girls in Vegas -- ones that are far more attractive than anything you'd find at any of the brothels -- for $200 an hour. So yeah.

You don't want any that aren't in Henderson, unless you want just a HJ at best. AFAIk there's none in downtown anyway, the closest ones being the (supposedly bad rip off) ones on Paradise north of Sahara.

Interesting. I have Asperger's and I pretty much want deep smooching as much as I can. Though yeah 'slobbering' is a bit much. Still, kissing me everywhere is a great way to get me going. The male body is more than a penis... (though I agree about the script thing)

And of course without the ability to sell your media you're going to buy less so you don't get burned by not liking it. Well, me anyway.