Hover over the Review, click to expand and read entire review, click to collapse
Legend: E = Experience, # = Number of Reviews, Date = Review Submitted
Provider | E | # | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bria | No | 3 | 1/17/16 | |
Seen on 1/13/16
Time: 1 hr Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: No Recommend?: No Smoking: Unknown Pictures Accurate: No, fake pictures Additional Website Link: http://denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts//13764107 Experience Description: Bria, aka, Bree, has the most deceptive ads that I have ever seen (excluding AMPs, which by now, hopefully everyone knows, always post fake pics). If the partial facial pics are of her, they are from 20 years ago. If this woman is 44, she's a very rough looking 44 year old and did not have "honey brown" hair. Neither is her body an "hour glass" as her ad states; might sound cruel, but the best description I have is Jabba the Hutt. The pics she posts of her hair show a nicely shaped upper bod, but if she used an actual pic of her backside showing her hair, you would actually see a body that more resembles a square (really big from neck down). I am not adverse to BBW, but I have never been with a woman who is so large that she has rolls of fat on the inside of her knees. Her CBJ skills were pathetic and most of that was hand. She doesn't 69 and didn't want DATY. FS was so-so (not terrible) but her size made that a bit difficult so I finished with Russian. Her boobs are very large which I usually enjoy, but they just didn't do it for me - maybe because they were fat too, not sure why. Her posts say "real pics", which I guess all pics are, they're just not of her or are from long ago. Her ad also claims she is reviewed, but I didn't find any. Also, though a perhaps small point, I don't consider her near "the DTC" as she lives closer a lot closer to Broadway and Hampden area. Btw, I do see many girls that don't have reviews knowing they might be a bust, TOFTT so to speak, so I do end up reviewing less desirable providers. |
||||
JaeShell | Rip-Off | 1 | 11/9/15 | |
Seen on 11/9/15
Time: 30 min Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: Rip-Off Recommend?: No Smoking: Yes, not during the session Pictures Accurate: Yes Additional Website Link: http://denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/60qh-incall-attention-big-boob-lovers-filipina-thick-bombshell-all-naturalaiming-to-please/20736683 Experience Description: JaeShell's donation rates are 60/80/120/160 (qtr, hhr, 45 min., hr) and I went with hhr to see how it'd go. Pictures - what you see is what you get. Everything is an upsell; all you get for these rates are straight FS and covered BJ. Had to pay an extra for kissing and DATY which she called GFE. Can't touch her face because she says she'll break out and she doesn't like the feel of skin on her nips so you can't touch them either.. She was responsive to DATY but very dry. Nice person but not a good provider and the upsell sucked. Don't recommend and won't repeat. |
||||
Tantalizing Tracy | Yes | 4 | 4/30/15 | |
Seen on 4/30/15
Time: 1 hr Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: Yes Recommend?: Yes Pictures Accurate: Unknown Experience Description: Almost all of us have let our little head control, but I went far beyond that. I was hoping Tracy's pics were a bad representation, but they actually concealed how unattractive "she" is and I quote "she", because I now believe "her" to be a post-op tranny. You'd think by looking at "her" pics, it would be obvious, but when you look at "her" website and see pics of her kitty, it seems impossible that this could be a recreation. HOWEVER, and unfortunately subsequent to going through with the session, I observed numerous male-fema8le vaginal constructions and was amazed at how real they are looking these days. Tracy's face is extremely acne pocked; basically, she does not take care of "herself". She had no unpleasant odors, but "she" did have a number of very large body "pimples" and some rash on the back of "her" legs. As I type, I am becoming even more disgusted with myself - it wasn't that I was so horny that I couldn't say NO, it was more like curiosity. I'm not trying to be mean here, but I think Tracy is a post-op male to female with very dominant male genes remaining (like hair on lip). Don't let your curiosity get the best of you - just don't go there. BBBJ was really good, but in support of my conclusion that Tracy is a transexual, she did not want to provide FS, and making excuses, didn't. |
||||
Vicky | No | 8 | 9/1/14 | |
Seen on 9/2/14
Time: 15 min Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: No Recommend?: No Pictures Accurate: Unknown Experience Description: Absolutely the worst experience that I've had in over 30 years of hobbying. Now I've run into a number of 3Gs, which she quite be defined as, but never have I ever run into such an impersonable person. I walked into an extremely dark hotel room and was in there 20 seconds when she asked for money. No, "hi, nice to meet you?" or "how are you doing today?"; she yawned from the moment I walked on in the door. She told me to get comfortable and in a flash she was naked on the bed. When I laid down she just laid there, she didn't speak to me and looked at the wall. I wasn't there to jump on a dead fish, so I was interested in a little fore-play. Thinking that might awaken her (I am almost always extremely successful with quality of the service once I begin foreplay and DATY), I gently stroked her, but she still stared at the wall. Shocked, she told me, after about 2 minutes of lighting stroking her, she told me that's all well and good for your girlfriend. She did allow me DATY and commented on my ability, but then, another comment about how that's great for a girlfriend. Because it was so dark in the room, I got no satisfaction of the visual we guys thrive on. Essentially, this session was like being with a dead fish. And so unpleasant, that I have to think her other positive review must be a shill. |
||||
Nikki (720-xxx-4792) | Yes | 4 | 3/10/14 | |
Seen on 3/10/14
Time: 30 min Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: Yes Recommend?: Yes Pictures Accurate: Unknown Experience Description: This session was little more than what transpires with an AMP absent the hot oriental girl. Of the 30 minutes there, 25 minutes was a body rub and wasting time. She kept the phone on and both sent and received texts while I was there. Her greatest assets are her tits, yet they are hands off. She put them in my face and then when I tried to touch or lick them she moved away. Although there isn't much room for trying different positions anyway, you pretty much get an option of missionary or doggie, either which she rushed. Someone described her a "firm" to which I'd say, if there's enough fat, that keeps the skin from becoming baggy or drooping. This was as bad as any session that I have had and I've been hobbying in Denver since 1995. In all reality, when it comes to actual FS, you get more with a visit to a Colfax hooker. |
||||
Sundance | Yes | 32 | 9/9/12 | |
Seen on 9/9/12
Time: 45 min Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: Yes Recommend?: Yes Pictures Accurate: Unknown Experience Description: Sundance has been around awhile and has had good REV; however, I was disappointed. Although she appeared personable, it almost came across as a well-rehearsed spew. For example, she discussed her boobs and their names as though that were a line of discussion made in every session. She is much larger than what her pics depict and that was a turn-off for me; HOWEVER, if you like large women, she might be your "cup of tea". Aside from that, and these are just my preferences, I was a bit turned off by her very stiff hair sprayed hair (I prefer soft and natural). Really enjoying DATY, I was disappointed. She allowed it and apparently really enjoyed it, but as a guy, I like the visual of it; but because of her size it was a bit difficult as she made no effort to raise her hips and because of her size, she sunk into the matress. To satisfy my need for visual stimulus, I suggested doggy, but she insisted that she needed to "feel me" and when a bit of insistence from me for doggy was ignored, I relented. Basically, I felt that after she got hers, which she stated was quite good, I was rushed into FS and not allowed to get some of what I desired (i.e. nice visual from doggy and a little more foreplay). I've noted that MSOG was provided to others but I never got a hint of any more activity after my first pop; in fact, she got up immediately after and went into another room, coming back all wrapped up. ********************** ASP REBUTTAL: I know this client that wrote this review and he was very unhappy to begin with. What he failed to mention is that i ask him to cleanup before we got started because he smelled ....he kept on starting and stopping and it was almost into one hour and 40 minutes. I finally got him finished and got up and went to the bathroom.. I never do a "well rehearshed play" and i am not 5'4 250 lbs and over 50. Look at my other reviews , i have never gotten a bad review as such! This was his opinion and reaction to a poor performance and session on his part which started with hygiene issues. Check his other reviews. He doesn't seem happy with anyone else and I can bet the other ASPs weren't into it because of this. ************************************* |
||||
Cece (Souix Indian) | No | 1 | 8/26/12 | |
Seen on 8/27/12
Time: 45 min Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: No Recommend?: No Pictures Accurate: Unknown Experience Description: Per instruction from the little head, the big head may no longer contact providers that are not well reviewed. Truly Cece's face is exotic. She is not mean or rude, she is just blaaahh. I told her that we'd go for 30 minutes and see how that went and if it were a nice time, I'd do the hour. When she disrobed, she initially kept clothing around her stomach and when my hand roamed under, it was clear why - she pushed my hand away. DATY is really a priority for me but as I headed for the Y, my head was pushed away. It took quite a bit of coaxing before she acquiesced. I always try to get a full meal when at the Y which almost always is a positive result when it comes to a fulfilling overall session; however, I did not get the same feedback with Cece. After about 30 minutes, I got a slight moan, so I thought I was on track and proceded. Just about 10 minutes later, when it was apparent that we were past the 30 minutes and I was beginning to think she was not a clock watcher, she informed me that the hour would be up in 10 minutes. How clever! The slight moan was, unaware to me, at just about the 30 minute mark; although apparently watching the clock the entire time, she never said a think about being at the 30 minute mark. She is very calculating. If you think the way I do and want to commit to only 30 minutes with an unknown provider, keep your eye on the clock, because she certainly is. If you go over that time in any way, she'll be expecting an hour's donation. In the end, she pretty much just laid there like a fish and almost never made eye contact. http://www.tnaboard.com/img/gal/12961_cece_1.jpg |
||||
Zoe (720-882-xxxx) | No | 6 | 9/24/11 | |
Seen on 9/25/11
Time: Location: DenverIn-Call/Out-Call: In-Call Experience: No Recommend?: No Pictures Accurate: Unknown Experience Description: Firstly, I've been reviewing here since about 2001; however, whenever I leave town for awhile, my nick disappears (my 1st session was Sweet Caroline). That said, when I looked here for Zoe's REV, 2 of 5 were no-shows. Dispite that, when we spoke, I never got a hint that she would be pulling that kind of crap; well, I was wrong. INCIDENTALLY, she is now using phone number 720-229-5196. |