Lucy Kitten

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    3,991

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lucy Kitten

  1. Posted

    4 hours ago, JRWolfe said:

       amazing.....but then again it has been awhile since my last visit.much prefer the days that swing clubs were couples and single women only.

    Pesky discrimination laws but I agree. At the Mon Chalet they make single guys rent rooms so on the weekends when it gets busy rooms get full and couples get shafted. 

    0

  2. Posted

    5 hours ago, Ile Haversnatch said:

    With handles that include bad, dude...women, etc., I wonder how many who consider themselves men truly understand the part biology and nature play in our role, our function as men. Judging by the overwhelming tendency to coddle and/or appease women that I've seen on this board, I'm sad to conclude they're not many.

    Despite the fact most women appreciate a real man and for brevity will clarify not meaning one who manscapes, quick with attempts to illustrate a supposed hypocrisy in one stating they are old school and chivalrous because they are the men they profess to be (you know who you are), what you fail to realize is you've sipped the Kool-aid of a feminist movement which, by emasculating the man, has gone astray.

    Being the guy who will open doors, compliment your outfit/perfume, tell you how smart and amazing you are, in the end...

    "I'm into having sex I'm not into making love." - Fitty!

    Of course, tender sensibilities frazzle at the notion a female is on this earth for males to fuck and not just that but, as many and with as little risk as possible! Forget the Bull Shit, speaking to our imperative to reproduce, it's just real talk! In the herd's rush to judgement, some find it easy to forget that everyone on this board defies at least some of the basic tenets of feminism which include, taking a definitive stand against misogyny, the objectification of women, etc. which, though the byproduct of the "modern" society, is perfectly fine - no one is espousing keeping women at home, barefoot and pregnant! However, we shouldn't forget it wasn't that long ago in our existence when men had to be men for our mere, collective existence and, given current events, it won't be long before we'll have to rely on our inherent strengths and weaknesses, to survive! I mean, let's face it, women (and "modern" men) can think what they want, we all know who's most likely to nurture little ones, drag prey home to the fire and/or keep intruders at bay when all hell breaks loose.

    That is all.

     

    You that fragile bro? 

    2

  5. Posted

    International Day To End Violence Against Sex Workers. 

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Day_to_End_Violence_Against_Sex_Workers

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/katherine-koster/16-facts-about-sexual-ass_b_8711720.html

    "reminder on #InternationalDayToEndViolenceAgainstSexWorkers that not all violence is physical. attacking our livelihood and our lifestyle; criticising our choices, our intelligence, and our autonomy; attempting to shame us and destroy our spirit . . . this too is violence." 

    KESWA%20Sex%20workers%20march.jpg?itok=i

    13

  7. Posted

    1 hour ago, stevie-2249 said:

    why would I lie about that lucy? come on now! 

    I said you were the one yes out of the chorus of nos. If 8 people said don't drink the poison but one person said drink the poison what would you do? 

    0

  8. Posted

    1 hour ago, Laci French said:

    Now I need to come to Stevie’s defense. He is a great man with a heart of gold.  Period.  

    If a guy likes quick visits so be it because there are those out there that will offer the services.  Not my thing because my pussy isn’t a fast food drive thru.  

    Aren't we all supposed to be nonjudgmental in this lifestyle?  And for fucks sake can’t we all just be holly jolly and all of that?

     

    You just called pussy that does that fast food drive thru.  Maybe if one is really trying to be jolly the should not be judgmental when telling people to not do that very thing. 

    0

  9. Posted

    45 minutes ago, Ile Haversnatch said:

    When and where is it OK for specific services to be advertised, FS or otherwise? Not on your ad which I just looked at to find we'll mix geekdom with passion, with no mention of the Man in the Boat. And whittled down to a "Contact: (XXX) XXX-XXXX" on BP, I have to ask, what advertising? Then there's the whole skies falling if the hobbyist asks specific questions, making it all a crap shoot by definition, mainly for the hobbyist. Not that providers don't roll the dice, because I know they do but then, so do cops, firefighters and Navy Seals, all in the line of "duty".

    As seen by a few responses here, FS QV is most definitely not unheard of, and I knew this with my OP. The question was, is it a rip-off to receive a H.J.B Franklin in exchange for my efforts which, unless the hobbyist knows going in, an improbability at best, I believe the answer is yes, as the least to be expected is a BnG for it. Well, Homey Don't Play That and neither do his Benjamins so, hh or better it is but, having met with the equivalent of blow-up dolls for more, I have to let the provider community know...the struggle is real. We're in it together, no?

    Since you seem to lack the reading skills, it's been covered many times on this board that the BP ads are not by choice. So I guess what you're wanting is for us to full on incriminate ourselves with explicit advertising so it's easier for you? Why does anyone need to explicitly advertise when we have reviews anyways? The cycle of information falls on you guys too. 

    There was one reply in favor of FS QV, one and I wouldn't take his word, everyone else had the same sentiment. QV are not they way to get to know a provider and way more often than not they are not FS. It's not a rip-off to only get a HJ in fifteen minutes. And what efforts are you making? All the effort for a QV is made by the provider. Same amount of time and effort spent getting ready for a client that wants to pay the cheapest rate possible. 

    You got your answer and you didn't like it. If you want validation for your choices don't frame it as a question. 

     

    1

  10. Posted

    2 hours ago, Ile Haversnatch said:

    Calling me a cheap ass was not keeping it real but, thanks again.

    But wanting FS QV is cheap! Wanting it all while paying the very least is kind of the definition of cheap. It's especially cheap if you're asking for QVs when they're not advertised. 

    4

  11. Posted

    5 minutes ago, SultryKitten said:

    Mine is still up because I keep paying it, and haven't changed anything in my ad...if I try to, it will require just a phone number. BP has literally jumped to #1 on my shit list!

    xoxo,

    Samantha Sheppard

    Maybe you found a quirk? It would not let me renew existing ads with text even with a sponsored ad. My guess is it's only a matter of time. 

    0

  12. Posted

    34 minutes ago, Yorick said:

    Yup.  I see so many reviews where the client waxes poetic about how "clean and fresh" the DATY was, and I wonder about your comment above.  Posted this mainly because  of that, and the fact that I actually enjoy the somewhat musky scent of an aroused woman.  Also, the author held some strong opinions on the subject, and I was hoping some enlightening conversation would ensue.

    While I do sometimes enjoy a smelly pussy joke, and have once or twice myself found myself in the presence of a "fish market", that was not my purpose here.  Just wondering what people thought.  Even if the thread turned humorous at times, it could still be helpful or interesting.

    Just have to be careful you don't leave it open to disaster. I personally don't think vagina jokes are funny. They can be traumatizing, you would be shocked at how many people including women don't understand how their own body parts work.  Even more shocking how judgmental women can be of other women when it comes to vaginas.  Where's the clit jokes and the myth of the female orgasm ruined sexual mentality for women for a long time. These days shaving and squirting are the hot topics and another cause for vagina stress. 

    The author's strong beliefs are justified, people are fools. Just read the comments, mostly from men who don't understand vaginas. "Fine. Leave. I'm sure finding a satisfactory man willing to be a doormat about your lack of hygiene will be a whole lot easier than just doing a little scrubbing down there." Comments just like that, despite the fact the the article spelled out how to properly care for a vagina and that it should have an odor just not a foul one.  If in my personal dating life I found myself fucking a dude that didn't understand that vaginas have a scent I would kick him to the curb too. I am too old for nonsense like that. 

    The Daily Mail is also a totally trashy rag. 



     

    3

  14. Posted

    On 12/5/2017 at 2:12 PM, PolyWM said:

    I just haven't figured out why some people are still able to post full adds to subjects.  The ladies I've chatted with about it haven't had a clue.  It's made it harder to find what I'm looking for when I"m on the road.

    If you switch the view to gallery mode you see pictures instead of just phone numbers. 

    1

  15. Posted

    21 minutes ago, airamericavet65 said:

    You will never be Riff Raff

    How about in the spirit of the holidays we stop calling people who do things like use BP riff raff?  Plenty of ladies around here use it and are facing some real struggles. 

    4

  16. Posted

    48 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

       And how many of the photos on BP are real and not stolen/fake ??

    I guess you'll find out when you search the pictures like I suggested. 

    0

  17. Posted

    6 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

       First of all, when you used  the word "mob," you are enhancing the stereotype that a criminal element such as the Mafia was involved. Not the case ( but I sure got a lot of people asking )

    Second, on August Ames twitter.she stated that she refused to work with what the industry calls a "crossover." That is a porn actor that performs in gay as well heterosexual  adult videos. She turned the scene down,especially as it called for unprotected sex. Granted all talent is tested monthly, but it was simply something she felt uncomfortable to do. Her call and in my humble opinion ...a good one.

    Sadly, the "mob" that you actually referred to was a group of her peers in the industry. They called her "homophobic " and much much worse. Again,in my humble opinion...a HUGE mistake on their part. 

    I'll be at the AVNs in January,should be interesting.

    To answer another question, Yes i met her once,but only for a few minutes at a industry event. She was drop dead gorgeous,very personable and did not come across at all as being jaded .

    The case is still being investigated.

    Mob has more than one meaning, she was relentlessly bullied by a mob of assholes. 

     

    https://twitter.com/LexiSindel/status/938803020673925120

    2

  19. Posted

    On 12/1/2017 at 11:06 PM, sparkey600 said:

    Kali,

    Once again you prove yourself a total gem. I love the way you offer suggestions for people to be better people. I Love that about you! 

    Mods, come on? Do we really need to be arguing about taxes on here???

    Is there someone who can close this before everyone on here forgets why they are on here in the first place and gets even more STREESD OUT?????

    Peace and thanks in advance!

     

    Why close it? Let the naysayers be naysayers. No one is really arguing some people just can't resist being nasty. 

    We are all here for different reasons but one of the reasons many come here is to be informed. There aren't many places where we providers can really talk shop. The whole point of my post was to be helpful and it helped so why close it? 

    NO offense but you seem to be more bothered by this than the participants. Providers need knowledge and we should not ask for threads that are informative to be shut down. I'm not stressed are you? 

    1

  20. Posted

    9 hours ago, NoCoGeezer said:

    Nah, nothing to do with net neutrality. Just trying to make it harder to advertise adult services, in the hopes of driving off advertisers. 

    Because text is gone, now you can't advertise services for certain illicit without prescription things. No naughty words or emojis implying certain acts (aside: yeah! no longer getting the hooker fonts throughout ads and subject line, boo! no hooker fonts in that it made it easy to spot which ads I've seen and decided to avoid [trying to recognize numbers is hard enough for me with numbers I should know]). Hoping johns will avoid since no data in these new ads. Yes, some providers have figured out the "put your ad text into a pic", but guessing some change down the road will be to allow only one picture per ad, and will flag any that are descriptive text.

    Such an expert. Are you saying they don't want to make millions anymore? They're avoiding the law and congress. They're stripping themselves of culpability. 

    It's called adapting. All the data you need is phone number and if that's not enough search the pictures. 

     

    0

  21. Posted

    9 hours ago, Cecilia said:

    My thought was that once the session ended some loser might go to PayPal to reverse the payment.

    My real life business accepts credit cards but I'm too concerned with crossing ties to use it for the hobby.

    Bitcoin is super useful for this. Both stay anonymous and payment can't be reversed. 

    1

  22. Posted

    1 minute ago, Laci French said:

    I haven’t taken shots at you. My opinion is just different than yours and I voiced it the same as you.  

     

    LOL you did. With your little I don't think this thread gets business and maybe she should rethink it. Differing opinions are fine but there is not one person in this thread who disagreed without making a personal comment or some sort of backhanded comment. And yes that includes you unfortunately. For being such a nice person you certainly don't care when people say nasty things about people you "don't agree with". We may not be friends but if the people here talked to you the way they talked to me I would intervene because it's grossly disrespectful. 

     

    -1

  24. Posted

    6 minutes ago, Bit Banger said:

    Danger, Will Robinson, DANGER!

     

     

    Before you get all "Pick on Lucy", I would make the same remark about any YL who publicly admitted saving email records: you, Mellissa, Laci, it doesn't matter. This is a major violation of the discretion we expect on both sides of the aisle. 

    Saving records for lying clients is exactly why we do what we do. He wants to come on here and spout bullshit I will share the evidence with him because sharing private correspondence is against the rules. He's cancelled on me many times and I not going to not keep records of that. 

     

     

    1