Posted October 23, 2018 bcynott 720-767-5125 Colorado Companion https://theotherboard.com/users/133865 Phone search shows a name. She links to Instagram which links to Snapchat. Curious about her... anyone seen her? Probably too much of a gamble for me to TOFTT. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted October 23, 2018 It's always a gamble, even when has a review or two. Instagram looks legit, as a couple of selfies on there and not used in ads, and they line up. Instagram has been active since April/May, so not thrown together at last minute. So, can be a bit sure on girl in real life is one in pics. Now, finding a name attached to a phone is not always valid. Many of these hits contain old information. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted October 24, 2018 Don't trust that instagram, some of the pics were on the instagram of another YL before she was banned here and took hers down. Provider was LovelyLiz23, and her personal website was the instagram for "Msistoleurbitch". (https://theotherboard.com/users/132156) Interestingly enough, one of her 5 followers is bcynott. This photo is the one I recognized seeing before at first. This bad boy was for suresies on Liz's IG, I remember the tickets And last but not least, this one looks pretty spot on to Liz's hair (and is another duplicate photo) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted October 24, 2018 The 1% chance I was going to see her went to zero, thank you! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, rkraft1 said: I thought she was sweet an I trusted her than she took my car be careful with this one You wrote her a good review? If you have seen her since and had different results you should write another review!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 3, 2018 21 hours ago, rkraft1 said: yea I tried to write another review but it rejected me an I don't want her to come after me. Rejected you? Please elaborate. And Mods, is there a legit reason that a review with info the could protect hobbyists would be rejected? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites