Guest

MISS ADRIANNE

19 posts in this topic

Adrianne
Colorado Companion

Haven't seen her post in awhile. Has anyone seen her lately?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe she is touring provider.  I am not sure from where

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys! It’s Bree. Adrianne used to work together and shared a number for screening. My p411 account got messed up and I guess it linked to hers somehow. I’m getting it fixed! 

And Adrianne is awesome! Lover her to death! 

:-)

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, mountainrider33 said:

Her pics are amazing but I'm glad she threw in some selfies.  The problem with the professional shots is the same thing I have a problem with many professional photographers, they get lazy.  They do great in taking the photos but are lazy in their post processing.  They end up making the skin look like plastic.  If you want to do the best job for the client then do the processing that takes longer but retains texture in the skin.

   Actually ,the best pro photographers know studio lighting well enough that there is no need for photoshop ( or any other post processing ) . That said..both Bree and Adrianne posted pictures show that they are photogenic  and could have had careers as professional models,had they no ink.  Currently there is a backlash for photo shopping out tats for the very reason you mention. Doing so ,no matter how well its done,makes the texture of the skin look....odd. They sure are stunning lookers ,can see why the escort crowd likes them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, mountainrider33 said:

Absolutely, they are both amazing to look at.  One provider I seen had professional shots done and had her tattoos removed in them so nobody would recognize her.  I have to say, I had to go back and look at the photos to see where he had removed them.  That photographer's post processing skills were extremely good.  I could barely notice and I even knew where to look.  

   Although I can understand her need not to be recognized, its false advertising to those guys that do not like ink on women.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/10/2018 at 2:05 PM, JRWolfe said:

   Although I can understand her need not to be recognized, its false advertising to those guys that do not like ink on women.

I would like to know why pfunk down voted you?  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, frankenthaler91 said:

I would like to know why pfunk down voted you?  

   Good question as my point was valid.   There are guys that love tats on women and there are those that do not. Why should a lady disappoint those that do not like the ink ? 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMG_20180616_231231.jpg

On 6/10/2018 at 1:05 PM, JRWolfe said:

   Although I can understand her need not to be recognized, its false advertising to those guys that do not like ink on women.

On 6/10/2018 at 1:05 PM, JRWolfe said:

 

Not so much, as long as the provider fills the " tattoos" field in their profile with accurate info, and the client does their due diligence and reads the profile section 😉😉

Edited by Emily Jordan
Screenshot upload
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Emily Jordan said:

IMG_20180616_231231.jpg

Not so much, as long as the provider fills the " tattoos" field in their profile with accurate info, and the client does their due diligence and reads the profile section 😉😉

  We read. Ever notice how many say they have no tattoos  ,yet they are noticeable in their photos ? (quite a few ).

If someone has ink, its how many tats that  should be seen so one can decide if they are interested. In other threads, gents have stated they don't mind a couple,but are turned off by full body "art."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

  We read. Ever notice how many say they have no tattoos  ,yet they are noticeable in their photos ? (quite a few ).

If someone has ink, its how many tats that  should be seen so one can decide if they are interested. In other threads, gents have stated they don't mind a couple,but are turned off by full body "art."

I certainly don't consider taking tattoos out of a picture false advertising though, especially if they are distinctive, would reveal real life identity, and the provider has disclosed in other ways that they have them? There are options in that field as well, I believe they are none, some and many. 

5 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

 

5 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Emily Jordan said:

I certainly don't consider taking tattoos out of a picture false advertising though, especially if they are distinctive, would reveal real life identity, and the provider has disclosed in other ways that they have them? There are options in that field as well, I believe they are none, some and many. 

  Best reason ever not to get something distinctive .  Sadly, I could name a few that stated "some" but were actually beyond many. I see your profile states that you have some. Is that why you are being defensive ??  Simply curious and not putting you down.

Edited by JRWolfe
found info
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

  Best reason ever not to get something distinctive .  Sadly, I could name a few that stated "some" but were actually beyond many.

Interesting perspective, thank you for sharing.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Emily Jordan said:

I certainly don't consider taking tattoos out of a picture false advertising though, especially if they are distinctive, would reveal real life identity, and the provider has disclosed in other ways that they have them? There are options in that field as well, I believe they are none, some and many. 

I agree with Emily. It's perfectly reasonable to remove tattoos out of the picture. If the lady has full body art then she should say "many" on the tattoos selection and remove them all if she wants.

9 hours ago, JRWolfe said:

...Sadly, I could name a few that stated "some" but were actually beyond many. I see your profile states that you have some. Is that why you are being defensive ??  Simply curious and not putting you down.

The concept of "Some" tattoos is very subjective, it's not an objective category. For her maybe it's just some, but for a client it might be too many. There's no way to fix that because you'll have to count the number of tattoos. It's the same as the concept Body Type = "Curvy". Who is going to set the limit of what is or what is not "curvy"?  Maybe for me she is too thin or too fat to be curvy, but she has the right to see her body as "curvy"

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Emily Jordan said:

I certainly don't consider taking tattoos out of a picture false advertising though, especially if they are distinctive, would reveal real life identity, and the provider has disclosed in other ways that they have them? There are options in that field as well, I believe they are none, some and many. 

It's easy enough to obscure the details with most any photo editing software. A little pixelation and voila, not distinctive!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Emily Jordan said:

Interesting perspective, thank you for sharing.

Actually, it's "shared" at every opportunity.....  Getting old. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now