Chrissy

Stormy Daniels

107 posts in this topic

40 minutes ago, ilovewomen said:

Agreed.  This isn't a one sided issue.  It's both sides.  The constant finger pointing is not getting things done.  Fire them all and let's start over.

Then put in term limits to keep the new batch from becoming as corrupt

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, airamericavet65 said:

Then put in term limits to keep the new batch from becoming as corrupt

Term limits do little or nothing. Just call up the next automaton for the party. Voting in a party or parties that is NOT EITHER of the two major pathetic choices is the only path to change.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ilovewomen said:

Agreed.  This isn't a one sided issue.  It's both sides.  The constant finger pointing is not getting things done.  Fire them all and let's start over.

Precisely, except we need to fire BOTH PARTIES, not just a few current members. Keep the two existing parties and NOTHING will change.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ilovewomen said:

Agreed.  This isn't a one sided issue.  It's both sides.  The constant finger pointing is not getting things done.  Fire them all and let's start over.

This is the new normal. We do not have any news sources, just propaganda departments. Anytime now that "the other party" wins, you do NOT accept it, but instead launch a continuous propaganda attack from all angles.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JoDoe27 said:

I have to ask but why exactly is she a disgrace? 

   Pros don't kiss  and tell.They leave .

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, airamericavet65 said:

Then put in term limits to keep the new batch from becoming as corrupt

   Explain how the alleged Daniels affair  corrupted anything.  Trump was a private citizen then and didn't run for office until a decade later.   Rather hypocritical of any private citizen on this board to past judgement.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

Precisely, except we need to fire BOTH PARTIES, not just a few current members. Keep the two existing parties and NOTHING will change.

Gr8owl and Laci in 2020🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

   Pros don't kiss  and tell.They leave .

I get that but The WSJ pretty much told her they were going to run this story with her front and center regardless of how she felt about it. 

Again I point out she sat on this for over a decade, and some snooping uncovered the payments. As you all have said countless times don’t leave a paper trail. And the paper trail didn’t start with her  

So why should she sit quietly and be dragged through the mud instead of at least turning it into a profit for herself? Also, why does she have to absorb the brunt of this? Like I’m trying to understand why she’s the bad guy. 

Also, in all of this; the cheating, the payments, an NDA and she’s the disgraceful one? 

Edited by JoDoe27
5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Might as well as start campaigning now.

Laci French for President 2020!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Laci French said:

Gr8owl and Laci in 2020🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

A fine idea but who would be on top ....... err, i mean who would be the head person ...... err, wait .... who would be vice ..... dammit ...... you know what i mean! 😎

24 minutes ago, Laci French said:

Gr8owl and Laci in 2020🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

3 hours ago, ilovewomen said:

Agreed.  This isn't a one sided issue.  It's both sides.  The constant finger pointing is not getting things done.  Fire them all and let's start over.

Precisely, except we need to fire BOTH PARTIES, not just a few current members. Keep the two existing parties and NOTHING will change.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Stormy feels it is okay to go back on something she signed, is she setting a president for any lady in this hobby to follow suit and disregard the expected "no tell" aspect of provider - client interaction????? That question is certainly causing me (and others I know) to seriously question further experiences,  especially in light of all the recent changes in this passtime.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ilovewomen said:

Might as well as start campaigning now.

Laci French for President 2020!!

And I even have the campaign slogan:  "If you are going to get fucked by the President, you might as well enjoy it!  Laci for President!"

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, leigeois said:

She will ride it out as long as she can, then after she blows through her cash, she will pop up on some news channel to try and make herself relevant again so that she can once again make the money she will blow through yet once again......

Like her or not, admire her or not, Stormy is one smart businesswoman.  She is one of the most successful adult-film producers and had an estimated net worth of over $5 million, before the current controversy.  She is very unlikely to "blow through" the cash she is making off of her current notoriety.  BTW, she was in full compliance with the Nondisclosure Agreement for many years, until she was outed by the press and then was insulted by Trump.  I would have then told my side of the story as well, if I was in her position.

Speaking of being in her position, you can have your own Stormy Daniels life-size, life-like sex doll for just $5,999, and customize it as you like (vaginal style, mouth and throat style, etc.) for just a few hundred more.  Not my style, but those of you who are interested should go to https://www.realdoll.com/product/stormy-daniels-wicked/  to check it out.  You too can be just like the president....

 

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, BadBoy said:

Speaking of being in her position, you can have your own Stormy Daniels life-size, life-like sex doll for just $5,999, and customize it as you like (vaginal style, mouth and throat style, etc.) for just a few hundred more.  Not my style, .

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:...Riiiigggghhhhtttt!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"BTW, she was in full compliance with the Nondisclosure Agreement for many years, until she was outed by the press and then was insulted by Trump."

Yea, try telling that to the jury:  I WAS in compliance until I wasnt!  Being insulted does not invalidate your responsibility to comply....

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Fritzie said:

"BTW, she was in full compliance with the Nondisclosure Agreement for many years, until she was outed by the press and then was insulted by Trump."

Not exactly. The NDA was signed (sort of) in Oct 2016. About 18 months ago. I'm also certain that there is a big difference between being "insulted" and allegedly being THREATENED by Trump/Cohen et.al.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would prefer to not even think of this woman and what she represents.  Breaking an agreement, speculating on her value or even buying her rubber doll for $6K.  I have better things to spend my time on...for instance campaigning for Laci French for president sounds like a far better idea to me.  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/30/2018 at 8:39 AM, JoDoe27 said:

Her body of work really doesn’t have much to do with this, but if your view on it stands then my point is made that people love to see a disaster. 

As for the NDA she signed; you’re right she signed it. And sat quiet for 10yrs. Then received a payment to further keep quiet. Then the WSJ did some digging and uncovered the payment. This was back in 2016. So almost 2 more years go by and she’s still quiet but somewhere in there got a lawyer.

   My point was that at the "height " of her video career,her product had very low sales.  Low sales =  more desire to hire her = loss of income for her. On the feature dance circuit she was never a draw = clubs not interested in hiring her= loss of income for her.

"Scandal breaks '...suddenly in demand on the club circuit.  Reportedly, some clubs pack out, some clubs do not As for her Denver appearance this weekend, looking at the clubs website,they do NOT know how to get the most bucks out of a feature dancer performance.The vast majority of clubs,that I've chatted with at the annual strippers convention , sell tickets per show that the feature dancer performs,not the one day ticket that the Cabaret is selling. Usually,once a customer sees one performance,they rarely stay for a second or a third.The novelty having worn off. How many of you even heard of her before this "scandal" ???  Are you going out of curiosity ?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, JRWolfe said:

   My point was that at the "height " of her video career,her product had very low sales.  Low sales =  more desire to hire her = loss of income for her. On the feature dance circuit she was never a draw = clubs not interested in hiring her= loss of income for her.

"Scandal breaks '...suddenly in demand on the club circuit.  Reportedly, some clubs pack out, some clubs do not As for her Denver appearance this weekend, looking at the clubs website,they do NOT know how to get the most bucks out of a feature dancer performance.The vast majority of clubs,that I've chatted with at the annual strippers convention , sell tickets per show that the feature dancer performs,not the one day ticket that the Cabaret is selling. Usually,once a customer sees one performance,they rarely stay for a second or a third.The novelty having worn off. How many of you even heard of her before this "scandal" ???  Are you going out of curiosity ?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

I’m not going. She never did it for me (yes I knew who she was well before this) back in the days of slow internet dialup/DSL in my bedroom, nor does she do it for me now with high speed and tube sites. And I’m cool not spending $30-40 for a ticket plus driving down from Boulder and so on. 

I don’t knock anyone for going for whatever that reason may be, but would like for people to keep it 100 on why they’re attending. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fritzie said:

MOnica was 18, not 25

Not sure what your point is: we were all 18 once; but Monica was 22-23 when she had an affair with BC...:rolleyes:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 4:59 AM, Fritzie said:

What kind of person signs a confidentiality agreement, takes the money that goes back on her written word for a technicality?  

Trump, if he could get away with it. FDT. :cool:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 0:50 PM, leigeois said:

She will ride it out as long as she can, then after she blows through her cash, she will pop up on some news channel to try and make herself relevant again so that she can once again make the money she will blow through yet once again......

Don't ya just love capitalism.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Mr.Pink said:

LoL, have you thought about selling your tickets, I saw the event was sold out....she looks like she was ridden hard and put away wet.

How wet is she? :rolleyes:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/30/2018 at 0:38 AM, Chrissy said:

I know it sounds crazy but I bought 3 tickets to see Stormy Daniels downtown...  I kind of personally feel like she is somewhat responsible with her damn interview comments to why things have changed at a rapid Pace that are somewhat abnormal... 

Is anybody else going to see her ???

I am just kind of curious and don't want to be the only one 😂😂😂

I'm sorry but wouldn't touch that with yours and certainly not with mine. Think of where it's been. Donny, you're a braver man than me!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Were you there? Do you have a copy of the Trumps’ nuptials or pre-nuptial agreement?  Unless you do, you have no idea what he & the mrs. agreed to.

My wife & I did not include fidelity in our marriage vows.  We agreed to support each other, which we did “in sickness and in health.” We also did not include “until death do us part”, replacing that with a pre-nup.  But it worked out that way in the end.

So, seeing escorts, getting my rocks off, was NOT cheating.  One day my wife even told me to go out & get laid; I was getting cranky.  It all depends upon the agreement between the parties involved.

The only real difference between #44 and many (most?) of the clients here is a few zeros(0s) in front of the decimal place.

As for #41, his big problem was that he kept sticking it to loose lipped civilians.

No, Stormy is getting the disdain of this community for any escort who lacks discretion.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Bit Banger said:

Were you there? Do you have a copy of the Trumps’ nuptials or pre-nuptial agreement?  Unless you do, you have no idea what he & the mrs. agreed to.

My wife & I did not include fidelity in our marriage vows.  We agreed to support each other, which we did “in sickness and in health.” We also did not include “until death do us part”, replacing that with a pre-nup.  But it worked out that way in the end.

So, seeing escorts, getting my rocks off, was NOT cheating.  One day my wife even told me to go out & get laid; I was getting cranky.  It all depends upon the agreement between the parties involved.

The only real difference between #44 and many (most?) of the clients here is a few zeros(0s) in front of the decimal place.

As for #41, his big problem was that he kept sticking it to loose lipped civilians.

No, Stormy is getting the disdain of this community for any escort who lacks discretion.

I think you meant #42 and #45. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, JoDoe27 said:

I think you meant #42 and #45. 

Yep! My bad😟 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now