Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
funtimes50

411 on Sarah

11 posts in this topic

Going out on a limb that pics are stolen. Same number in Sarah's ad was used by an AA lady in Dallas bsck in October, which also seem to be TGTBT.

http://dallas.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/hey-guys-nuru-140-and-more-special-call-now/47680737

and the fact there is a different number/girl using same pics.

http://www.bodyrubhistory.com/714-485-7011/?id=91919161258167

And that there is a webpage with all these photos attributed to a "Chelsea E".

http://fapler.com/gallery/483976

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, fred1964 said:

They are stolen. Do a tineye search. ^_^  https://imgur.com/a/unsxB

Why would he? Just post a 411 and let You guys do all the work LOL

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/13/2018 at 8:41 AM, Chrissy said:

Why would he? Just post a 411 and let You guys do all the work LOL

Some of us are not very good at Tineye searches.... Present company included

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the research.    So....... no one on the forum has seen her?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 3/14/2018 at 9:10 AM, Fritzie said:

Some of us are not very good at Tineye searches.... Present company included

Google Chrome for mobile devices makes life super easy. Press-hold the picture, tap on "Search Google for This Image". Done. Just keep going through ALL the pictures in the ad until you turn up a hit.

47 minutes ago, funtimes50 said:

Thanks for the research.    So....... no one on the forum has seen her?

Guessing probably not as few on this board are going to TOFTT with such obviously TGTBT pics and hoping that she's at least 90% close to looking like that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think is most likely in these scenarios - someone who offers fbsm using a pretty girl's pictures, or something significantly more nefarious/dangerous? 

I'm sure there are examples of either of these, but what do you think is more common based on your experience? 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Raemid said:

What do you think is most likely in these scenarios - someone who offers fbsm using a pretty girl's pictures, or something significantly more nefarious/dangerous? 

I'm sure there are examples of either of these, but what do you think is more common based on your experience? 

In 50+ years of ‘the hobby’ I’ve only had one(1) dangerous experience and just a few nefarious (cash & dash, strippers only, upsell hustle, etc.).

I have no idea what the gal behind the curtain looks like, but she’s probably average, someone you’d see out shopping. Services? Probably NOT cuddlesome GFE with a drink & shower.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Missed the edit window:

— Edit —

I grew up in the days w/o Internet advertising, back in the print media and YellowPages days. Photos were expensive. Today everybody is pressured into putting an image/photo in their ad and it’s cheap. The new BP policies, designed to give them plausible deniability under Federal regulations regarding Internet publishing, just adds pressure.

Just as guys have fear of screening, gals have fear of putting too much of themselves out there (for similar reasons). But they need a picture in their ad, so they grab a pretty image from someplace on The ‘Net and use that. Remember - superlative sells, average doesn’t.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/14/2018 at 10:10 AM, Fritzie said:

Some of us are not very good at Tineye searches.... Present company included

Alternatively, hover your mouse/pointer over picture in question. Right click and select "Search Google for image".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0