InterestedinCOS-8553

Exotik Eve...... Anyone?

8 posts in this topic

13 hours ago, InterestedinCOS-8553 said:

Isn't 90% of this hobby fetishistic? I'm not sure I fully get what you're saying. 

Just his never ending crusade against tattoos - does not believe any lady should have them.  But to look at a lady and only see tats .............

I have found her ads and pics pretty intriguing also for a month or two.  I happen to like well done tattoos, but you could throw a tarp over the lady in the pics and she would still be pretty hot.  The fact there are only real ads in two cities, always same name, same phone and obviously same lady in a ton of pics with no image search hits all would argue it is time to TOFTD.  Yeah, screw the team unless the team is paying, take one for the dick - yours.  Only deal killer for me is the 21 part - never go that low.  But there is no way to be sure ............ could be a train wreck.  Feeling lucky?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, gr8owl said:

Just his never ending crusade against tattoos - does not believe any lady should have them.  But to look at a lady and only see tats .............

From a professional view, JR has a point. Unless it's a Suicide Girls campaign, tats may either detract from or conflict with the product/service being photographed. I agree, this gal has a smokin' bod. 

10 hours ago, gr8owl said:

... Only deal killer for me is the 21 part - never go that low.  ...

The last time I dated a youngster (over a decade ago, reputable agency, we exchanged IDs) was a disaster. Oh, she knew the basic missionary motions, but not much else. And with the age gap, there wasn't anything else to do, no connection. In an AMP, there may be a language barrier, but at least you often get a decent massage. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/26/2017 at 6:45 AM, Bit Banger said:

From a professional view, JR has a point. Unless it's a Suicide Girls campaign, tats may either detract from or conflict with the product/service being photographed. I agree, this gal has a smokin' bod. 

 

I do not question JR's extensive knowledge of porn industry, and I am sure he is correct that tats reduce a lady's ability to get hired to model or act in film where they can't be covered. (which is pretty sad for those of us that like well done tats).  But the OP and everyone else looking at the pics knows she has tats.  That was not the question - only whether she is legit, good at what she offers,  etc.  My point was that to call her "hardly a number one choice" is pretty insulting, especially when based only on her choice to have tats on her body.  And totally useless in answering the questions OP had.

5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now