Bit Banger

DPD officer in hot water

27 posts in this topic

14 minutes ago, Chrissy said:

Screw Him!! The Prostitute chose to snitch on the entire community!

Just Wow!!

14 minutes ago, Chrissy said:

 

 Are we allowed to post other forum threads?  This one seemed familiar...

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1914611

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bit Banger said:

$40? Slept together but no sex? You've got to be kidding me. 

That's why he got off with a slap on the wrist: he's a good guy that made an honest mistake. :rolleyes:

The comments section on the article is a good read, and I basically agree with the comments re: the "thin blue line" nonsense. If Average Joe got caught up with a hooker, not going to get a slap on the wrist. I appreciate the work of the good cops out there, but protecting these criminals, who should be held to stricter standards regarding the law, grrrrrrr!

Also looks like the cop was named in a police abuse case from 2005.

Guessing this joker is close to retirement, so, reason DPD is protecting him.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chrissy said:

 Are we allowed to post other forum threads?  This one seemed familiar...

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1914611

 

Great minds think alike Chrissy. I had to go back and research this myself. I guess she wasn't fibbing, but did snitch. Damn....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the part of that news story that caught my attention:

After the woman paid bail and left the Downtown Detention Center, she agreed to talk to detectives about local online escort services, pimps, prostitutes and drug dealers, the letter said. During the interview, she allegedly told them that she had been paid for sexual acts by a Denver police officer.

Son of a gun, looks like we will be getting a newbie poster coming on soon with a silly question.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BadBoy said:

This is the part of that news story that caught my attention:

After the woman paid bail and left the Downtown Detention Center, she agreed to talk to detectives about local online escort services, pimps, prostitutes and drug dealers, the letter said. During the interview, she allegedly told them that she had been paid for sexual acts by a Denver police officer.

Son of a gun, looks like we will be getting a newbie poster coming on soon with a silly question.

I think there was a touch of sarcasm with your last bit but I also know there’s s thought on this board that actually feels that way. So my question is; why do you think new members asking newbie questions are cops when all information is readily available on the site for free? And really the only thing someone needs to do is actively participate to gain trust??

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bigger concern here is HOW IN THE HELL does she still have her p411 and Eccie accounts.??????

She or THEY Just logged in as a matter of fact. 

9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Chrissy said:

The Bigger concern here is HOW IN THE HELL does she still have her p411 and Eccie accounts.??????

She or THEY Just logged in as a matter of fact. 

Probably because the mods of those services haven't put the pieces together yet. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, JoDoe27 said:

I think there was a touch of sarcasm with your last bit but I also know there’s s thought on this board that actually feels that way. So my question is; why do you think new members asking newbie questions are cops when all information is readily available on the site for free? And really the only thing someone needs to do is actively participate to gain trust??

Actively participate and CONTRIBUTE over a period of time is required to gain trust. Yes, there's plenty of free material, but recommendations can add confirmation to that information in damaging ways. The Old Guard is likely to be even more cautious for a while now. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell! I'd be cautious of Old Guard as well!

Big scheme of things, so what re: talking to PD about online sites. They know these sites exist. Most likely visit on a regular basis. And probably have sign-ons. Nothing information-wise she can provide that will be useful. You visted her and used your real phone, gave a real name, etc., maybe something to be concerned about.

Now, you start getting random messages from this lady or some new lady asking to meet up because she heard you're a great guy, my Spidey Sense would be off the scale.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bit Banger said:

Probably because the mods of those services haven't put the pieces together yet. 

I don't know how they couldn't, Bit. It's very blatant. 

I hope that passwords etc were not turned over, at least for the one booking site. This is why some of us screen so hard. It's for your protection and ours. It would be nice to think that this stuff does not happen. Think about all of the scenarios that are not reported and/or self reported in this case.:mellow: They are amongst us....

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why you Never Snitch on any clients. Who gives a fuck what the clients do for living. There job is no my fucking business. I don't give a fuck if who is fucking who, shut the fuck up. Zip it don't snitch

Edited by Nikki Holiday
5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Bit Banger said:

How many of you noticed this story in the Post?

http://www.denverpost.com/2017/10/10/denver-police-officer-suspended-prostitute/

$40? Slept together but no sex? You've got to be kidding me. 

Doesn't sound like he admitted to having sex with her for money. So.... maybe that why he only got suspended. 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Chrissy said:

The Bigger concern here is HOW IN THE HELL does she still have her p411 and Eccie accounts.??????

She or THEY Just logged in as a matter of fact. 

P411 doesn't do drama. One the reason I enjoy there services. As for ECCIE I'm not sure how they work. I hardly post there. 

P411 probably are not aware of it. But if someone reports it, then she might lose her account for snitching esp since this guy almost lost his job now he on news stations with public humiliation on top that to public.... 

Edited by Nikki Holiday
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nikki Holiday said:

This is why you Never Snitch on any clients. Who gives a fuck what the clients do for living. There job is no my fucking business. I don't give a fuck if who is fucking who, shut the fuck up. Zip it don't snitch

Escort rule #1 DENY, DENY, DENY! These men are our bread and butter. Never admit to knowing them! Especially to a wife or employer!!!! I have ZERO respect for any lady who does this! 

6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Audrey Astor said:

I don't know how they couldn't, Bit. It's very blatant. ...

This story broke in the papers & TOB yesterday morning. The ECCIE thread started almost a year ago, but did not include any outing until more recently.

I do NOT expect P411 staff to monitor every escort board for this type of thing. It's up to us to keep our own house clean. I'm sure that once alerted, they will take appropriate action. 

Edited by Bit Banger
Formatting
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Bit Banger said:

This story broke in the papers & TOB yesterday morning. The ECCIE thread started almost a year ago, but did not include any outing until more recently.

I do NOT expect P411 staff to monitor every escort board for this type of thing. It's up to us to keep our own house clean. I'm sure that once alerted, they will take appropriate action. 

The investigation was in February according to the story on the post. I think the time line fits really well. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, boink36 said:

The investigation was in February according to the story on the post. I think the time line fits really well. 

Well, if there is any doubt, looks like she changed her ECCIE profile within last 24hrs. Took her pictures off, changed the fields to say "outta here" and changed her display name and signature to "SJ", same as initials in police report.

ADD: looks like she's added her side of the story to her showcase page.

Edited by NoCoGeezer
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She’s a good lady, as far as my conversations and interactions with her go.  Can’t always believe the press or the police, or anyone for that matter.  Always more to the story, so reserving any judgment and being sympathetic to the community member as well as the officer is what I am doing, and hoping the best outcome for both.  Even if sex was involved, it shouldn’t be a crime and one should not feel threatened or coerced, or perhaps misrepresented in what they say or don’t say to Le.  Assuming she talked, what could she say that they don’t already know?  Assuming the officer is lying and the two had sex, wouldn’t that still be two consenting adults and perhaps it occurred after a legitimate massage or something?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ala_carte said:

 Assuming she talked, what could she say that they don’t already know?  Assuming the officer is lying and the two had sex, wouldn’t that still be two consenting adults and perhaps it occurred after a legitimate massage or something?

you do realize that paying for it is against the law.....right?

No Words

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Mr.Pink said:

you do realize that paying for it is against the law.....right?

No Words

Well, it depends on what the "it" is.  Paying for time and companionship is not against the law.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BadBoy said:

Well, it depends on what the "it" is.  Paying for time and companionship is not against the law.

If she has Priors ,Your word or hers No longer matters to the Courts.

 

On 10/10/2017 at 8:34 PM, Audrey Astor said:

 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence of prior "bad acts" is not admissible for the purpose of establishing guilt.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every one be safe. Stings this week @ DIA. Birdie says it will be a week long deal :(

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now