Posted July 19, 2017 Lucy 303-680-8088 Colorado Escort She's been posting for the past few weeks out of Castle Rock (under free/additional ads) and has a couple of reviews here but the reviewers only have a handful of reviews to their names. I like to see something from someone with a little more rep first, if possible. The requirement to go through Kik is strange but maybe I'm just out of touch with things. I did download the app and contact her but was surprised a bit by the level of "detail" in her replies. Anyone here encounter her? http://denver.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/castle-rock-local-petite-professional-lover/40932908 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2017 On 7/19/2017 at 1:39 PM, JRWolfe said: a milf..at 21 ? Sadly, motherhood come early for some gals. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2017 I checked it out. A little strange in the setup and communications over KIK but all legit and good. Review coming. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2017 9 minutes ago, synoches said: I checked it out. A little strange in the setup and communications over KIK but all legit and good. Review coming. The communications over KIK was a red flag to me.Why not make it easier. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 19, 2017 10 minutes ago, JRWolfe said: The communications over KIK was a red flag to me.Why not make it easier. It was to me too but I started wondering.... "would LE use KIK?" Probably one day, but I doubt it's mainstream enough yet. Maybe that's the point. As far as the MILF thing, yeah, I noticed that too but I don't find that shocking, really. I found no physical sign of that (not trying to mean that there usually is) so it's possible she just threw that in there. I didn't ask. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 20, 2017 9 hours ago, synoches said: It was to me too but I started wondering.... "would LE use KIK?" Probably one day, but I doubt it's mainstream enough yet. Maybe that's the point. As far as the MILF thing, yeah, I noticed that too but I don't find that shocking, really. I found no physical sign of that (not trying to mean that there usually is) so it's possible she just threw that in there. I didn't ask. Maybe she doesn't know what MILF means. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 20, 2017 Has a profile here....................................... https://theotherboard.com/users/118834 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 21, 2017 On 7/19/2017 at 3:30 PM, synoches said: It was to me too but I started wondering.... "would LE use KIK?" Ummm... LE will use everything at their disposal... If drug dealers, human traffickers, etc are using it, so will they. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 21, 2017 4 hours ago, CountryGentleman said: Ummm... LE will use everything at their disposal... If drug dealers, human traffickers, etc are using it, so will they. You're absolutely correct. I made a "practical" assumption here and I also made an assumption that all of us at these forums operate the same way and that is we already know there is no absolute safety. With that in mind, I didn't bother to add in to my statements that there was an acceptable level of risk I was willing to take based on my conclusion. I just assume we all understand that already and operate that way. The only surefire safety net is to keep our pants zipped up. In this case, I made the assumption that it is not "yet" worthwhile to run a hotel sting operation with KIK as the sole channel of communication. I could be wrong and/or that may change in the near future. I'm pretty sure a phone number isn't a better guarantee, though. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 29, 2017 On 7/29/2017 at 9:26 AM, Fun4uco said: Personal information removed Did you have to interact with this boyfriend or is this all stuff she relayed to you? Dealing with a boyfriend is a little too weird for me and I was just about to move forward on a repeat visit. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 29, 2017 On 7/29/2017 at 9:26 AM, Fun4uco said: Personal information removed. On 7/29/2017 at 3:05 PM, synoches said: Did you have to interact with this boyfriend or is this all stuff she relayed to you? Dealing with a boyfriend is a little too weird for me and I was just about to move forward on a repeat visit. What is waaaaay too weird for me is divulging very personal things about a lady that are NOBODY'S frickin business on this forum. All but outing her for being foolish enough to share personal info with a twit. Can't imagine why she was "touchy" 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 29, 2017 58 minutes ago, gr8owl said: What is waaaaay too weird for me is divulging very personal things about a lady that are NOBODY'S frickin business on this forum. All but outing her for being foolish enough to share personal info with a twit. Can't imagine why she was "touchy" That's essentially why I want to know if this BF was a point of contact like that response made it sound. It's a large departure from my experience with her and I found her to be quite pleasant. I didn't dig into her "other life", though. She contacted me today as well and I too was unavailable. I'm not blocked, however. For the record (just so it's clear that she's not sending unsolicited messages), I did specifically tell her to feel free to let me know when she's available again. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 1, 2017 She has a personal life which she openly shared I see no reason to be concerned about a pimp or anything like that from my experiences so far. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 4, 2017 On 7/19/2017 at 0:42 PM, synoches said: Lucy 303-680-8088Colorado Escort She's been posting for the past few weeks out of Castle Rock (under free/additional ads) and has a couple of reviews here but the reviewers only have a handful of reviews to their names. I like to see something from someone with a little more rep first, if possible. The requirement to go through Kik is strange but maybe I'm just out of touch with things. I did download the app and contact her but was surprised a bit by the level of "detail" in her replies. Anyone here encounter her? http://denver.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/castle-rock-local-petite-professional-lover/40932908 I honestly didn't think anyone looked through the free advertising. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 7, 2017 On 8/4/2017 at 5:03 PM, SabrinaLynn said: I honestly didn't think anyone looked through the free advertising. It only shows up if you narrow the search area to specific town like "Castle Rock". 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted November 15, 2017 (edited) Just an update on her, she no longer provides GFE(kissing) to clients. I was set to make the appointment, through Kik, but I thought first I'd verify her rules/restrictions and GFE was one of them. I decided not to make an appointment, based on that. It was going to be my first time with a provider, so I was hoping to receive a session as close to regular sex as possible. According to the reviews, she had previously but appears to have changed on that subject. It's not in her ads, so I thought I'd give future prospects a heads up, so they don't go in expecting things that previous clients received and reviewed about. She was very nice during our Kik interactions. Edited November 15, 2017 by kalel33 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted June 25, 2020 Is she no longer providing in the dtc area? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted June 25, 2020 17 minutes ago, Patrickcc37 said: Is she no longer providing in the dtc area? No Nope Nadda No way Nyet 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted June 26, 2020 Quote Has a profile here....................................... https://theotherboard.com/users/118834 Error 404: file not found.. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted June 26, 2020 18 hours ago, sb1212 said: Error 404: file not found.. The thread is from 3 years ago, except it got bumped for some weird reason. Not surprised the links don't work 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted June 26, 2020 Maybe someone could explain to me how they managed to pull up a backpage ad like the Op included. Please use small words, and be gentle. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted June 26, 2020 47 minutes ago, meetandgreet said: Maybe someone could explain to me how they managed to pull up a backpage ad like the Op included. Please use small words, and be gentle. Sorta the reason for the response On 6/25/2020 at 3:19 PM, Kaduk said: No Nope Nadda No way Nyet Nothing to see here folks...... 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites