synoches

411 on Lucy-8088

25 posts in this topic

Lucy 303-680-8088
Colorado Escort

She's been posting for the past few weeks out of Castle Rock (under free/additional ads) and has a couple of reviews here but the reviewers only have a handful of reviews to their names.  I like to see something from someone with a little more rep first, if possible.  The requirement to go through Kik is strange but maybe I'm just out of touch with things.  I did download the app and contact her but was surprised a bit by the level of "detail" in her replies.  Anyone here encounter her?

http://denver.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/castle-rock-local-petite-professional-lover/40932908

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/19/2017 at 1:39 PM, JRWolfe said:

 a milf..at 21 ?

Sadly, motherhood come early for some gals. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I checked it out.  A little strange in the setup and communications over KIK but all legit and good.  Review coming.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, synoches said:

I checked it out.  A little strange in the setup and communications over KIK but all legit and good.  Review coming.

 The communications over KIK was a red flag to me.Why not make it easier.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, JRWolfe said:

 The communications over KIK was a red flag to me.Why not make it easier.

It was to me too but I started wondering.... "would LE use KIK?"

Probably one day, but I doubt it's mainstream enough yet.  Maybe that's the point.

As far as the MILF thing, yeah, I noticed that too but I don't find that shocking, really.  I found no physical sign of that (not trying to mean that there usually is) so it's possible she just threw that in there.  I didn't ask.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, synoches said:

It was to me too but I started wondering.... "would LE use KIK?"

Probably one day, but I doubt it's mainstream enough yet.  Maybe that's the point.

As far as the MILF thing, yeah, I noticed that too but I don't find that shocking, really.  I found no physical sign of that (not trying to mean that there usually is) so it's possible she just threw that in there.  I didn't ask.

  Maybe she doesn't know what MILF means.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/19/2017 at 3:30 PM, synoches said:

It was to me too but I started wondering.... "would LE use KIK?"

Ummm...   LE will use everything at their disposal...   If drug dealers, human traffickers, etc are using it, so will they.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, CountryGentleman said:

Ummm...   LE will use everything at their disposal...   If drug dealers, human traffickers, etc are using it, so will they.

You're absolutely correct.  I made a "practical" assumption here and I also made an assumption that all of us at these forums operate the same way and that is we already know there is no absolute safety.  With that in mind, I didn't bother to add in to my statements that there was an acceptable level of risk I was willing to take based on my conclusion.  I just assume we all understand that already and operate that way.  The only surefire safety net is to keep our pants zipped up.  In this case, I made the assumption that it is not "yet" worthwhile to run a hotel sting operation with KIK as the sole channel of communication.  I could be wrong and/or that may change in the near future.  I'm pretty sure a phone number isn't a better guarantee, though.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/29/2017 at 9:26 AM, Fun4uco said:

Personal information removed

Did you have to interact with this boyfriend or is this all stuff she relayed to you? Dealing with a boyfriend is a little too weird for me and I was just about to move forward on a repeat visit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/29/2017 at 9:26 AM, Fun4uco said:

Personal information removed.

 

On 7/29/2017 at 3:05 PM, synoches said:

Did you have to interact with this boyfriend or is this all stuff she relayed to you? Dealing with a boyfriend is a little too weird for me and I was just about to move forward on a repeat visit.

What is waaaaay too weird for me is divulging very personal things about a lady that are NOBODY'S frickin business on this forum.  All but outing her for being foolish enough to share personal info with a twit.  Can't imagine why she was "touchy" :cool:

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

 

What is waaaaay too weird for me is divulging very personal things about a lady that are NOBODY'S frickin business on this forum.  All but outing her for being foolish enough to share personal info with a twit.  Can't imagine why she was "touchy" :cool:

That's essentially why I want to know if this BF was a point of contact like that response made it sound.  It's a large departure from my experience with her and I found her to be quite pleasant.  I didn't dig into her "other life", though.  She contacted me today as well and I too was unavailable.  I'm not blocked, however.  For the record (just so it's clear that she's not sending unsolicited messages), I did specifically tell her to feel free to let me know when she's available again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She has a personal life which she openly shared  I see no reason to be concerned about a pimp or anything like that from my experiences so far.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/19/2017 at 0:42 PM, synoches said:

Lucy 303-680-8088
Colorado Escort

She's been posting for the past few weeks out of Castle Rock (under free/additional ads) and has a couple of reviews here but the reviewers only have a handful of reviews to their names.  I like to see something from someone with a little more rep first, if possible.  The requirement to go through Kik is strange but maybe I'm just out of touch with things.  I did download the app and contact her but was surprised a bit by the level of "detail" in her replies.  Anyone here encounter her?

http://denver.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/castle-rock-local-petite-professional-lover/40932908

I honestly didn't think anyone looked through the free advertising.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/4/2017 at 5:03 PM, SabrinaLynn said:

I honestly didn't think anyone looked through the free advertising.

It only shows up if you narrow the search area to specific town like "Castle Rock".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update on her, she no longer provides GFE(kissing) to clients.  I was set to make the appointment, through Kik, but I thought first I'd verify her rules/restrictions and GFE was one of them.  I decided not to make an appointment, based on that.  It was going to be my first time with a provider, so I was hoping to receive a session as close to regular sex as possible.  According to the reviews, she had previously but appears to have changed on that subject.  It's not in her ads, so I thought I'd give future prospects a heads up, so they don't go in expecting things that previous clients received and reviewed about.  She was very nice during our Kik interactions.

Edited by kalel33
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Patrickcc37 said:

Is she no longer providing in the dtc area?

  • No
    • Nope
      • Nadda
        • No way
          • Nyet
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, sb1212 said:

Error 404: file not found..

The thread is from 3 years ago, except it got bumped for some weird reason.  Not surprised the links don't work

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe someone could explain to me how they managed to pull up a backpage ad like the Op included. Please use small words, and be gentle.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, meetandgreet said:

Maybe someone could explain to me how they managed to pull up a backpage ad like the Op included. Please use small words, and be gentle.

Sorta the reason for the response

On 6/25/2020 at 3:19 PM, Kaduk said:
  • No
    • Nope
      • Nadda
        • No way
          • Nyet

Nothing to see here folks......

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now