Posted July 14, 2017 Camille 720-809-1537 Colorado Escort http://denver.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/bombshell-beauty/39296773 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 15, 2017 Not finding immediate red flags, but how about more pics: http://www.escortsinthe.us/720-809-1537/ 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 15, 2017 let us know if these pix are for real 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 15, 2017 Doubt real. Woman named Cree Ikuko aka Cree Johnson. https://www.google.com/search?q=cree+ikuko&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwi2jZjb8YvVAhXmj1QKHfGIA34Q_AUIBigB&biw=1188&bih=789 Great example of needing to really dig deep, not a simple pass of search on phone numbers and pictures in the ads. In this case, hit the following link: http://www.escortphones.com/720-809-1537/ Then start Google Image searching on the pictures on that site. Those pictures turn up the hits back to Cree Ikuko. Escortphones.com site is great for finding pics a provider used in the past. Can see if pics have swung wildly for a given number and or used patently false pics in the past. Or turn up photos that do get hits. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 15, 2017 Having grown up in the days of print advertising I have an easier way to vett pictures. I assume they're all fake, until proven otherwise in person. My screening merely answers the question: Am I likely to get arrested, beaten, or scammed? Now you may say that if she's using false pictures what else is she lying about? Hell, she's already lying to you; I doubt her folks named her Ivanna Kumalot. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 15, 2017 14 minutes ago, Bit Banger said: Having grown up in the days of print advertising I have an easier way to vett pictures. I assume they're all fake, until proven otherwise in person. My screening merely answers the question: Am I likely to get arrested, beaten, or scammed? This. Even with real pictures, those can lie (i.e. real old, flattering poses). For me, it's a bit of sixth sense when I read the ad: they just smell of "management", fly-by-night, etc. No reason to visit in that nothing in the ad to draw me aside from assumed stolen photos. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 16, 2017 7 hours ago, NoCoGeezer said: Great example of needing to really dig deep, not a simple pass of search on phone numbers and pictures in the ads. Yeah, that link I posted and saying "how about more pics" was my subtle (too subtle I would say) shot at hinting - "here, do some searching on these" if you are seriously interested, but personally I was not interested enough to search 'em all. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 16, 2017 6 hours ago, Bit Banger said: Now you may say that if she's using false pictures what else is she lying about? Hell, she's already lying to you; I doubt her folks named her Ivanna Kumalot. But yours named you Bit and the family name is Banger??? Do you have a brother Harvey W. ?? Don't think using a working name qualifies as lying. Willfully misleading photos certainly does qualify. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 16, 2017 2 hours ago, gr8owl said: But yours named you Bit and the family name is Banger??? Do you have a brother Harvey W. ?? Don't think using a working name qualifies as lying. Willfully misleading photos certainly does qualify. Around the house I'm call "Little Bit"😄 But seriously, I'm not advertising. Nor do I have a problem with her using a pseudonym as long as she's good with me doing the same. When they start insisting on RWI, w/o being willing to share the same, ... 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites