Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Mr.Pink

411 on bp Camille.

9 posts in this topic

Doubt real. Woman named Cree Ikuko aka Cree Johnson.

https://www.google.com/search?q=cree+ikuko&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwi2jZjb8YvVAhXmj1QKHfGIA34Q_AUIBigB&biw=1188&bih=789

Great example of needing to really dig deep, not a simple pass of search on phone numbers and pictures in the ads. In this case, hit the following link:

http://www.escortphones.com/720-809-1537/

Then start Google Image searching on the pictures on that site. Those pictures turn up the hits back to Cree Ikuko.

Escortphones.com site is great for finding pics a provider used in the past. Can see if pics have swung wildly for a given number and or used patently false pics in the past. Or turn up photos that do get hits.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having grown up in the days of print advertising I have an easier way to vett pictures. I assume they're all fake, until proven otherwise in person. My screening merely answers the question: Am I likely to get arrested, beaten, or scammed?

Now you may say that if she's using false pictures what else is she lying about?  Hell, she's already lying to you; I doubt her folks named her Ivanna Kumalot. 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Bit Banger said:

Having grown up in the days of print advertising I have an easier way to vett pictures. I assume they're all fake, until proven otherwise in person. My screening merely answers the question: Am I likely to get arrested, beaten, or scammed?

This.

Even with real pictures, those can lie (i.e. real old, flattering poses). For me, it's a bit of sixth sense when I read the ad: they just smell of "management", fly-by-night, etc. No reason to visit in that nothing in the ad to draw me aside from assumed stolen photos.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, NoCoGeezer said:

 

Great example of needing to really dig deep, not a simple pass of search on phone numbers and pictures in the ads. 

 

Yeah, that link I posted and saying "how about more pics" was my subtle (too subtle I would say) shot at hinting - "here, do some searching on these" if you are seriously interested, but personally I was not interested enough to search 'em all. :cool:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Bit Banger said:

 

Now you may say that if she's using false pictures what else is she lying about?  Hell, she's already lying to you; I doubt her folks named her Ivanna Kumalot. 

But yours named you Bit and the family name is Banger??? Do you have a brother Harvey W. ?? :P

Don't think using a working name qualifies as lying.  Willfully misleading photos certainly does qualify.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, gr8owl said:

But yours named you Bit and the family name is Banger??? Do you have a brother Harvey W. ?? :P

Don't think using a working name qualifies as lying.  Willfully misleading photos certainly does qualify.

 

Around the house I'm call "Little Bit"😄

But seriously, I'm not advertising. Nor do I have a problem with her using a pseudonym as long as she's good with me doing the same. When they start insisting on RWI, w/o being willing to share the same, ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0