Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest

When a client threatens to write negative review when you refuse to see them

41 posts in this topic

Bella
Colorado Escort

What does a provider do in this instance? I have had a person threaten to write a negative review because I wouldn't see them. I believe that provider has the right to refuse services to anyone without recourse. Any thoughts?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have the right to refuse whoever you chose and he has the ability to submit a review. Note you have the opportunity for a rebuttal. If he does, he better be correct or this forum will beat him down like a Narc at a Biker rally. 

:cool:

7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol.... Thank you so much for your input....

👄Bella

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bella Marie said:

Bella
Colorado Escort

What does a provider do in this instance? I have had a person threaten to write a negative review because I wouldn't see them. I believe that provider has the right to refuse services to anyone without recourse. Any thoughts?

Assuming there is no "other side" and therefore taking what you describe literally:

You and every lady absolutely have the right (independents anyway ... another story) to refuse service to anyone for any reason that is important to you with safety topping the list.  The fact he threatened you and tried to coerce you simply proves he is a flaming douche that you were wise to refuse to begin with.  Ignore and move on.  He persists consider black listing his ass.  As Mackonit says, you can dispute a review.  Lastly, most seasoned guys here recognize bullshit (fake review, etc.) in a heart beat.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The review can't stick if you two never arranged to meet. If he does a review, you can show the mods your communication with the gentleman that indicates you refused to see him.

 

Edited by Wendy Whitney
Added more
5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for that advice. I had a creepy feeling about him so I didn't respond to his texts. That is when he said he was going to write a review. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Threatening a provider with a phony negative review is just a "Dick Move". It's your body and your business who you choose to see and who you don't. A Gent's only recourse is to accept your decision not to see him and move on to the next YL on his wish list. Any form of retribution after being denied access on his part is classless and juvenile.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, MrBigShot said:

Threatening a provider with a phony negative review is just a "Dick Move".

As gr8owl mentioned, we only have the provider's side of the story.  If this happened, it truly is a "dick move"

 

12 hours ago, Bella Marie said:

Thank you all for that advice. I had a creepy feeling about him so I didn't respond to his texts. That is when he said he was going to write a review. 

If I had a tendency to be skeptical (and I sometimes do) this sentence might cause me to suspect that we haven't been given the whole story.

Bottom line:  If he writes a bad review, you can post a rebuttal.  It doesn't sound like you can prove you didn't see him, so I don't see a way of preventing the review from being posted.

And:  If the majority of your reviews are positive, one bad review won't hurt you.  But, I see you have none, which makes me even more skeptical (that is, if I were the skeptical type :))

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MAG said:

 

Bottom line:  If he writes a bad review, you can post a rebuttal.  It doesn't sound like you can prove you didn't see him, so I don't see a way of preventing the review from being posted.

 

With the information available, we have to take the YL at her word. Proving that a hypothetical session didn't happen is for people who wear tin foil hats. The burden of proof is not on the YL in this scenario IMHO.

Perhaps the Gent will post a review of the Hypothetical Session and we can read the rebuttal from Bella. We'll just have to wait and see.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mag,

Thank you for your input but I've requested that my clients not review. Simply due to the fact I prefer anonymity as well. Once a client sees me they know what I offer. More often then not they become regulars. I just don't want a lot of traffic at my location.👄Bella

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MrBigShot said:

With the information available, we have to take the YL at her word. Proving that a hypothetical session didn't happen is for people who wear tin foil hats. The burden of proof is not on the YL in this scenario IMHO.

Perhaps the Gent will post a review of the Hypothetical Session and we can read the rebuttal from Bella. We'll just have to wait and see.

With the information available, we have NO way of knowing what did or didn't happen.  That's not tin-foil, that's common sense.

And, there is no "burden of proof" at play here.  If the guy submits a review, and it sounds credible, more than likely it will get posted.  All she can do is post the rebuttal.

I smell CYA here, but we will see what happens if/when the review appears.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mag,

We'll see if he actually does. If he does I have everything I need to prove my innocence. 👄 Have a lovely day!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On another note: If he does write a review, and it's inconsistent with your other reviews, we mongers tend to ignore that review, suspecting it's a sour grapes type of incident.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MAG-  We have no way of knowing. This is where you and I have common ground.

Asking the YL to prove something didn't happen is not common sense. Our perspectives simply differ in that I choose to accept her at her word and you have chosen to be skeptical. It's just the difference in our world view in that I tend to seek out the good in people and that their motives are face value and you tend to search out something nefarious where nothing is there.

She doesn't accept reviews and has stated as such. So we'll never know.

Unless you are the Gent in question...If so, give me a minute to put on my tin foil hat!

Edited by MrBigShot
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MrBigShot said:

MAG-  We have no way of knowing. This is where you and I have common ground.

Asking the YL to prove something didn't happen is not common sense. Our perspectives simply differ in that I choose to accept her at her word and you have chosen to be skeptical. It's just the difference in our world view in that I tend to seek out the good in people and that their motives are face value and you tend to search out something nefarious where nothing is there.

She doesn't accept reviews and has stated as such. So we'll never know.

Unless you are the Gent in question...If so, give me a minute to put on my tin foil hat!

Don't psychoanalyze me.  You don't know enough about me.  I chose to chime in to this thread because most people seemed ever-so-willing to take her at her word.  She has no reviews, and her response to Wendy was a little too convenient.

As gr8owl said, most people here can spot BS.  So, let the chips fall.  I acknowledge that it could have happened exactly as she said -- I know full well there are guys who will threaten a bad review if they don't get what they want.  I also know full well that there are providers who will make up a story to deflect a bad review.

There is NO evidence either way.  If you want to blindly jump to her defense based on one side of the story, go ahead.  I choose to withhold final judgment until the review is posted, if it ever is.  Until then, I'm skeptical.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MAG said:

Don't psychoanalyze me.  You don't know enough about me.  I chose to chime in to this thread because most people seemed ever-so-willing to take her at her word.  She has no reviews, and her response to Wendy was a little too convenient.

As gr8owl said, most people here can spot BS.  So, let the chips fall.  I acknowledge that it could have happened exactly as she said -- I know full well there are guys who will threaten a bad review if they don't get what they want.  I also know full well that there are providers who will make up a story to deflect a bad review.

There is NO evidence either way.  If you want to blindly jump to her defense based on one side of the story, go ahead.  I choose to withhold final judgment until the review is posted, if it ever is.  Until then, I'm skeptical.

I don't have to psychoanalyze you. It's all too obvious what type of person you are by your posts here. You and I just have differing opinions on just about everything including how we respond to YL's who post here.

I'll defend your right to express your opinions and respect your perspectives, always! Regardless of the fact that we rarely see "eye to eye".

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MrBigShot said:

It's all too obvious what type of person you are by your posts here.

Yes.  Balanced.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, MAG said:

Yes.  Balanced.

LMAO!

Combative. Contentious and Cantankerous. Never Vanilla! Is how I would describe you, My Friend. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MrBigShot said:

LMAO!

Combative. Contentious and Cantankerous. Never Vanilla! Is how I would describe you, My Friend. 

Well, we do have something in common.  That's exactly how I would describe you, also.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MAG said:

Well, we do have something in common.  That's exactly how I would describe you, also.

Yet we somehow manage to get along? Go figure.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya, I'd suggest that this be moved to another forum. Personally I'd be interested in all sides to the story since I'm always looking for different providers and getting a good head for BS that reviewers write (just get to the private mens sections in ECCIE and look at the whoppers of stories and BS they make up their for epien haha). 

But if you've prevented reviews, then a guy can't attach it to your name as far as I know. If you want to prevent traffic or thoughts on your location, the google maps location on your contact part of your webpage may not be a great idea (unless it's a couple blocks away, then ignore this). Even if you allowed reviews, and I don't know if/how you can prevent on some sites like TER/ECCIE, you certainly explain them away. Reviews let guys like me consider seeing others - no reviews and I worry that it's either a bate and switch or just wonder if you offer what I want.

Good luck in any case!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes....my pin on my map is a general location. As far as reviews, like I stated before, I prefer not to have them. I understand the hesitancy but I'm was also on another verification site.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about that moron.  Trust your gut.  See no one who makes you uncomfortable.  If your reviews are predominantly positive, his lone critique will hold little water.  And as Mackonit says, you have the ability to rebut.  State clearly why he freaked you out.  Reasonable folks will get the message.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/3/2016 at 9:13 AM, Wannabebad said:

Why is this in the 411 section? 

I'm sure somebody somewhere knows the answer to your question!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/30/2016 at 6:21 PM, Mackonit said:

You have the right to refuse whoever you chose and he has the ability to submit a review. Note you have the opportunity for a rebuttal. If he does, he better be correct or this forum will beat him down like a Narc at a Biker rally. 

:cool:

Does he have the ability to review if no meeting tool place? Barring NC/NS that doesn't seem review worthy. It also seems unfair to let a review like that go through while making a provider defend herself when she's already turned down a client. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disgruntled client blowing off steam trying to get you upset. Seriously doubt the guy will post and if he does? Most of us here have your back. Also, you have every right to run your business and not accept reviews. I know many providers that choose not to be revived and their reasoning is very legitimate for not wishing to be revived too. So of us love reviews while others of us don't wish to be. Just how you choose to handle your own affairs in the biz is all.

More power to you Bella!😎

Edited by Kali Sensual Reiki
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gawds sometimes I get so turned around with my words...have something to say but it just sounds so stupid when I peck it out! Sorry hopefully you can translate the message.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kali Sensual Reiki said:

Gawds sometimes I get so turned around with my words...have something to say but it just sounds so stupid when I peck it out! Sorry hopefully you can translate the message.

Here I hope this helps.....

1 hour ago, Kali Sensual Reiki said:

Dysarestiménoi peláti ektónosis pou prospatheí na sas párei anastatoménos. Sovará amfivolía o týpos tha dimosiéfsoume kai an kánei? Oi perissóteroi apó emás edó échoun tin pláti sas. Epísis, échete káthe dikaíoma na ektelésete tin epicheírisí sas kai na min dechtheí schólia. Xéro óti polloí párochoi pou epilégoun na min anaviósei kai to skeptikó tous eínai polý themitó na min epithymoún na anaviósei pára polý. Étsi, mas agapoún schólia, enó álloi apó emás den théloun na eínai. Akrivós pós epilégete na cheiristeíte tis ypothéseis sas sto biz eínai ólo.

Perissóteri dýnami gia na sas Bella! 😎!

 

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0