Posted November 27, 2016 720-538-4474 Colorado Escort http://denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/a-night-with-me-cant-compete-ill-come-to-you-just-call-for-me/26670377 720-538-4474 No name, nothing is showing up in image searches. Anyone got any info? _______________________________________cached Ads cached Ad BP Denver escorts Dec 6, 2016 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nzVgFxZ_to0J:denver.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/a-night-with-me-cant-compete-ill-come-to-you-just-call-for-me/26670377+&cd=19&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us -1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted November 27, 2016 I had a pleasant chat via text, schedules have yet to align, she seems patient. But she has already changed phone numbers, kind of a red (4474 being the newest) 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted November 27, 2016 I had a nice chat with her by text too. Reasonable rates, all covered, definitely not GFE so didn't take it further. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 2, 2016 If she posts again I will do my best to see her and update you all, she definitely caught my eye. She is seemingly MIA at the moment 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 On 11/27/2016 at 11:06 AM, ajot said: I had a nice chat with her by text too. Reasonable rates, all covered, definitely not GFE so didn't take it further. If "everything" is covered, she certainly cannot compete. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 2 minutes ago, Paul Pudenda said: If "everything" is covered, she certainly cannot compete. Hahaha, perfect response! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 1 minute ago, Paul Pudenda said: If "everything" is covered, she certainly cannot compete. I thought the 411 forum was to get info about the provider(s) not for the purpose of the provider receiving your unsolicited business advice. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 (edited) 21 minutes ago, gr8owl said: I thought the 411 forum was to get info about the provider(s) not for the purpose of the provider receiving your unsolicited business advice. Piss off, runt. You have your standards; I have mine. You prove repeatedly that the owl is not a metaphor for wisdom. Edited December 4, 2016 by Paul Pudenda 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 16 minutes ago, Paul Pudenda said: Piss off, runt. You have your standards; I have mine. You prove repeatedly that the owl is not a metaphor for wisdom. Can't take a little factual criticism huh? But it is fun to call you on your bullshit on occasion. There is so much of it. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 2 minutes ago, gr8owl said: Can't take a little factual criticism huh? But it is fun to call you on your bullshit on occasion. There is so much of it. Factual criticism is fine. You, on the other hand, have little appreciation for facts or humor - and that doubles the fun for me. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 3 hours ago, gr8owl said: I thought the 411 forum was to get info about the provider(s) not for the purpose of the provider receiving your unsolicited business advice. While you purposefully took the funny snark comment there the wrong way, the entire point of ANY forum is unsolicited advice by others. More than half the 411s that saw a girl and that aren't a full endorsement of her or a "she does everything that can be done," are made of "she'd be great if she just did X." 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 13 hours ago, gr8owl said: I thought the 411 forum was to get info about the provider(s) not for the purpose of the provider receiving your unsolicited business advice. I thought it was a (good) attempt at humor. Some people just take things too seriously, I guess. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 14 hours ago, Paul Pudenda said: Factual criticism is fine. You, on the other hand, have little appreciation for facts or humor - and that doubles the fun for me. I am so thrilled to know I make you happy. Gives me chills. 57 minutes ago, MAG said: I thought it was a (good) attempt at humor. Some people just take things too seriously, I guess. True satiric humor requires there to be an underlying grain of truth to actually be funny. (yeah, I know, I don't understand or appreciate it per PP!!). In this case it was just a snarky swipe at provider(s) that choose(s) to guard her safety and health with "covers", and a third party quote at that. Many providers compete and succeed quite well with that model, even if it means they lose the patronage of some. I mainly wanted to see how he reacted to cheap passive aggressive bullshit responses that he is so good at. His response was predictable and gave the "runt" a true belly laugh. Priceless PP, aka "Big Dude" . And as far as who takes too seriously, who resorted to name calling (and baseless at that!) as a first line of defense? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 1 hour ago, gr8owl said: I mainly wanted to see how he reacted That is the textbook definition of troll. Besides, I don't think it was an attempt at "satiric" humor, if you want to be pedantic about it. It was basically a pun. Lighten up. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 4, 2016 49 minutes ago, MAG said: 1.That is the textbook definition of troll. 2. Besides, I don't think it was an attempt at "satiric" humor, if you want to be pedantic about it. It was basically a pun. Lighten up. 1. and apparently you missed this part " cheap passive aggressive bullshit responses that he is so good at. " He knows exactly what I mean, or is not as smart as I give him credit for. 2. definition of pun - a joke exploiting the different possible meanings of a word or the fact that there are words that sound alike but have different meanings. Nope, not a pun. Sorry I remain as always pretty light. BTW I do not think PP needs you to defend him MAG lol. -3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 22, 2016 On 12/4/2016 at 0:58 PM, gr8owl said: 1. and apparently you missed this part " cheap passive aggressive bullshit responses that he is so good at. " He knows exactly what I mean, or is not as smart as I give him credit for. 2. definition of pun - a joke exploiting the different possible meanings of a word or the fact that there are words that sound alike but have different meanings. Nope, not a pun. Sorry I remain as always pretty light. BTW I do not think PP needs you to defend him MAG lol. Definiely light in the loafers - and in the intellect. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 22, 2016 Just now, Paul Pudenda said: Definiely light in the loafers - and in the intellect. WOW!! What an intelligent and well supported retort. Some of your best work old boy. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 22, 2016 1 minute ago, gr8owl said: WOW!! What an intelligent and well supported retort. Some of your best work old boy. Glad to see that even you can appreciate it. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 23, 2016 Getting back to the OP question...... did any of you notice junk in the second picture down on the right? i noticed camel toe on the last picture but it sure looks like she has some equipment thrown in for good measure. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 23, 2016 Sooooo has anyone seen her? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted December 25, 2016 She also no showed on me after she saying she was on the way. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted July 15, 2017 Looks like she is posting again. New # 209-581-8279 Hailey http://denver.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/sexy-by-nature-naughty_-by_choice-%CE%B1v%CE%B1ilabl%CE%B5-real-18/40314243 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
