stevie-2249

Accurate pic

58 posts in this topic

My God ladies don't post pictures of your self and say they are real! Yea they might be you butif you gain like 50 lbs post those pics not just the skinny ones.

Amazing how someone has so many great reviews and they are totally false! 

I can already know what you guys are gonna say. 

She didn't know who I was, I tooknow a shower right before and I'm no fat guy or what ever other excuse you will give her.

Junior don't respond to that kind of stuff and I'm sure I'm not the only one? I hate to say it but I have to second guess half these reviews. 

Edited by stevie-2249
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stevie-2249 said:

My God ladies don't post pictures of your self and say they are real! Yea they might be you butif you gain like 50 lbs post those pics not just the skinny ones.

Amazing how someone has so many great reviews and they are totally false! 

I can already know what you guys are gonna say. 

She didn't know who I was, I tooknow a shower right before and I'm no fat guy or what ever other excuse you will give her.

Junior don't respond to that kind of stuff and I'm sure I'm not the only one? I hate to say it but I have to second guess half these reviews. 

I can not address this from the providers point of view but I can from the client side. Yes I feel that she should be as up front about her appearance, attitude, and service as she can. But we as the client have a responsibility to do our research as best we can. Whether as a couple our on my own I all way reach out to the other reviewers that saw her and have good reputations if there is anything more to add anout their experience. I can truly say that I have never be sorry about the choice that was made to ether see her or not see her. Having said that I never reach out to the single review guy l always try to reach the guys with some credibility I have not had any problem with getting a honest answer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, look who's back: Stevie the illiterate troll, with a new batch of complaints.  Funny how you constantly complain about the veracity of reviews, and yet have never posted a review yourself.  If you are picky, and there is nothing wrong with that, you should only call ladies whose reviews actually include the language "the pictures were accurate...."  If it isn't in the review, don't assume it to be true.

By the way, your post makes almost no sense.

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Badboy said:

Hey, look who's back: Stevie the illiterate troll, with a new batch of complaints.  Funny how you constantly complain about the veracity of reviews, and yet have never posted a review yourself.  If you are picky, and there is nothing wrong with that, you should only call ladies whose reviews actually include the language "the pictures were accurate...."  If it isn't in the review, don't assume it to be true.

By the way, your post makes almost no sense.

In this case i think understand what Stevie is saying and that he has valid complaints. One being ladies should not use old pics if they are MUCH heavier (or much thinner for that matter) now than when pics were taken. If a guy picks a lady cause she matches what floats his boat it is a major erection killer to get there and she is not even CLOSE. And is specially irritating when she has recent reviews that say "yes" to "are pictures accurate". If that is what OP is saying and pretty sure it is - i agree whole heartedly. As to writing skills not everybody here is going to win a Nobel in literature like Dylan anytime soon.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is this concept: "erection killer"?  I have a telephone post from about the time I park the car, and there is only one way it is going away..  Sure, there has been a deviation from the photos here and there, but it has gone both ways: sometimes better than photos, sometimes not quite what was expected.  On the other hand, there she is, a female person, still looking pretty good, ready to indulge my whims, and what-the-hell-little-head has taken over anyway, and he is blind.  Never once has a deviation from the marketing profile been an "erection killer."  Indeed, in this sporting life I have found that some of the ladies who are a bit bigger or smaller  or older than my personal ideal are just great sporting companions.  In my opinion, total happiness and satisfaction in this sport is only possible if you keep an open mind to new people and new experiences.  Damn, I will never forget my sixth girlfriend, 21, about 5' 4" and every bit of 165 pounds and still in my memory she is one of the foxiest and definitely the sexiest lady I have ever had the privilege of worshiping - if she put on another 20 I bet I would still feel the same way.

And this from a guy who usually only pursues "slender."

Dude, go in with low expectations and you will always be pleasantly surprised.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you saw an escort, and her pictures are truly inaccurate, please, post a review saying so. That is all anyone can expect you to do. If you don't post a review, you have no justification to complain about other people's reviews.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gr8owl hit on the nose, geez wonder why people donot post on here cause of you grammar cops.

Can't do a review says an error? do I need to be on a desk top?

I did my research on her and all reviews were like OMG on her looks service etc... and totally off when I went in, just expecting a lot going in I guess. 

Just ranting they should post more recent pics and that I believe guys post not so accurate information because they don't want to hurt their feelings 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been confused somewhat in the "are pics accurate" question myself. I went and saw a provider recently who I believe the pics were accurate but didn't show the whole story. It was a quandary on what I should put. I settled on "yes, pics are accurate" but then in my review expanded on that a little. The woman in question took AWESOME photos but IRL you finally saw what was artistically hidden. It's kinda like a fast food burger ad where the burger looks to die for but when you get it in real life the bun is all smashed, the pattie is about half the size of what was pictured and the lettuce is a little limp. 

Edited by Wannabebad
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stevie-2249 said:

 

Just ranting they should post more recent pics and that I believe guys post not so accurate information because they don't want to hurt their feelings 

This I do believe to be the case in many a review including my own sometimes. I want to be accurate but also don't want to really hurt a girls rep unless I was ripped off or given a run around. Just because it wasn't an OUTSTANDING time I still got what I came for so yes I may hold back some perceived negative information because it might have been my perception and not reality. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, stevie-2249 said:

My God ladies don't post pictures of your self and say they are real! Yea they might be you butif you gain like 50 lbs post those pics not just the skinny ones.

Amazing how someone has so many great reviews and they are totally false! 

I can already know what you guys are gonna say. 

She didn't know who I was, I tooknow a shower right before and I'm no fat guy or what ever other excuse you will give her.

Junior don't respond to that kind of stuff and I'm sure I'm not the only one? I hate to say it but I have to second guess half these reviews. 

Write a review of your experience. It's much more effective than casting blame on the members of this board for one provider that is using old and or inaccurate photos in her ad.

While you're at it...could you decode the sentence in bold? Not a grammar police(man)but am simply trying to understand your thoughts here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are two basic kinds of clients.  One is primarily service oriented...if the lady is remotely close to her pictures, and provides good service, this client will be happy.  The other is very visual, and demands the appearance he was expecting because it is important to him.

I am in the first camp.  I understand that the appearance camp exists...and I accept it....but I do not understand why the high level importance is placed upon appearance.  Oh well.  Takes all kinds. People want what they want.

Two points from the "service camp" about appearance:

I am there for the experience.  I am an engineer, not a fashion and make-up specialist.  I simply do not feel qualified to comment on a womans appearance beyond whether or not I was able to recognize her from her photos.  A lot of ladies here use old photos that are reasonably close to their present appearance.  This does not bother me a bit. If I am treated poorly, however, I will be likely to complain bitterly via a bad review.  Because I select reputable ladies, I have never had to do this.

Secondly, the ladies here are selling themselves. That takes thicker skin and bigger brass balls than 99 percent of the guys here have.  Like ALL businesses, when advertising, they will do so in a way that will tend to accentuate all of their positive features, and minimize their negatives.  And yes: every single provider I've met....being human beings....had some negative attributes.  Watch a Chevy, Dodge, and Ford truck commercial. See what they are doing there?  If they can do that in their ads....why can't the ladies do the same things?

 

Stevie....I understand where you are coming from....and you deserve to get what you think you are paying for.....but I do not understand it.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A question for those who have visual requirements:

Do you match her visual requirements for "comfortable" service?

It's a 2-way street, fellas. Over the years I have found that those in the 5-8 range tend to be more service oriented than the 9-10 arm candy. They are also more tolerant of my flaws. And as others have said, pics may be accurate, just not revealing. 

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Laplace said:

I think there are two basic kinds of clients.  One is primarily service oriented...if the lady is remotely close to her pictures, and provides good service, this client will be happy.  The other is very visual, and demands the appearance he was expecting because it is important to him.

I am in the first camp.  I understand that the appearance camp exists...and I accept it....but I do not understand why the high level importance is placed upon appearance.  Oh well.  Takes all kinds. People want what they want.

Two points from the "service camp" about appearance:

I am there for the experience.  I am an engineer, not a fashion and make-up specialist.  I simply do not feel qualified to comment on a womans appearance beyond whether or not I was able to recognize her from her photos.  A lot of ladies here use old photos that are reasonably close to their present appearance.  This does not bother me a bit. If I am treated poorly, however, I will be likely to complain bitterly via a bad review.  Because I select reputable ladies, I have never had to do this.

Secondly, the ladies here are selling themselves. That takes thicker skin and bigger brass balls than 99 percent of the guys here have.  Like ALL businesses, when advertising, they will do so in a way that will tend to accentuate all of their positive features, and minimize their negatives.  And yes: every single provider I've met....being human beings....had some negative attributes.  Watch a Chevy, Dodge, and Ford truck commercial. See what they are doing there?  If they can do that in their ads....why can't the ladies do the same things?

 

Stevie....I understand where you are coming from....and you deserve to get what you think you are paying for.....but I do not understand it.

 

So i guess you and others chiming in here answer ads with NO pics all the time - after all appearance does not matter. Who knew playboy was right to eliminate photos cause that does not interest guys!!

For clarity i have never and will never give any lady a hard time here for being too heavy, too short, too skinny or too ANYTHING. every guy has different tastes. But reality is ladies of a certain build and shape attract me and others with diffetent characteristics can be a real turn off. You will never convince me that is wrong or for that matter that most guys are not that way too. Therefore, if i am going to plunk down hard earned cash it is going to be to see a lady that i find physically attractive whether anyone else does or not! So when i choose to see a lady in part because she looks hot to me and reviews say pics are accurate only to find she has packed on 50 pounds when i get there (yes, HAS happened) it is a MAJOR disappointment. AND in my opinion is bait and switch. I will not enjoy the session much. What is so damn hard to understand here?

And for ladies why do it????? For every body type there are guys that will love your look. So why attract customers to your door that WONT by using way inaccurate pics??

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

1) So i guess you and others chiming in here answer ads with NO pics all the time - after all appearance does not matter. ...

2) And for ladies why do it????? For every body type there are guys that will love your look. So why attract customers to your door that WONT by using way inaccurate pics??

1) There are some of us who began this hobby in the days of print advertising (pre-Internet) when pictures were not available. We got used to taking our chances. 

2) Agreed!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope.  Never responded to an add without photos.  The ladies I picked have always been the lady in the add. I've seen spinners that show their tight little butt in the ad....the feature that drew me in...and discovered a mommy tummy.  Session was fantastic.  The ass was real.

The one unifying factor for all providers I've seen:  They were all hotter and sexier than I would feel confident in approaching in real life.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Laplace said:

Nope.  Never responded to an add without photos.  The ladies I picked have always been the lady in the add. I've seen spinners that show their tight little butt in the ad....the feature that drew me in...and discovered a mommy tummy.  Session was fantastic.  The ass was real.

The one unifying factor for all providers I've seen:  They were all hotter and sexier than I would feel confident in approaching in real life.

^^THIS^^ 1000% agree

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/17/2016 at 0:57 PM, Bit Banger said:

A question for those who have visual requirements:

Do you match her visual requirements for "comfortable" service?

 

when she starts paying for my time, that's when i'll start caring. :cool:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mr.Pink said:

when she starts paying for my time, that's when i'll start caring. :cool:

As long as you keep in mind that she may have VED(*), a fair answer. 

 

(*) Visual Erotic Dysfunction - a lack of passion due to bad visuals. 

Edited by Bit Banger
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/17/2016 at 0:57 PM, Bit Banger said:

A question for those who have visual requirements:

Do you match her visual requirements for "comfortable" service? If you mean do I match her idea of hot - are you f'ing kidding me? 30 years ago perhaps, but not likely even then lol

It's a 2-way street, fellas. Over the years I have found that those in the 5-8 range tend to be more service oriented than the 9-10 arm candy. They are also more tolerant of my flaws. And as others have said, pics may be accurate, just not revealing. 

I have found little to no relationship between ladies' looks and their tolerance level for my looks and resulting service level.  What I HAVE found is a direct relationship between being honest in ads and being willing and accommodating in services.  But my comments in this thread have nothing to do with whether the collective would rate a lady a 10 or she could be a model.  The OP and my comments have ONLY to do with whether she looks in person like her pics in her ads.  You and others keep trying to divert the conversation from its rather simple nature into other questions altogether.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/17/2016 at 2:23 PM, Laplace said:

Nope.  Never responded to an add without photos.  The ladies I picked have always been the lady in the add. I've seen spinners that show their tight little butt in the ad....the feature that drew me in...and discovered a mommy tummy.  Session was fantastic.  The ass was real.

The one unifying factor for all providers I've seen:  They were all hotter and sexier than I would feel confident in approaching in real life.

 

On 11/17/2016 at 3:50 PM, MrBigShot said:

^^THIS^^ 1000% agree

 

5 hours ago, Bit Banger said:

As long as you keep in mind that she may have VED(*), a fair answer. 

 

(*) Visual Erotic Dysfunction - a lack of passion due to bad visuals. 

LOL.  Do you guys make yourselves dizzy when you so vigorously talk in circles??  Thanks for the laughs!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had someone tell me the other day that I needed to take pictures that didn't make my features look bad because of the angles, and I told him that I was just trying to be honest in my photos not glamorous so guys knew what they were going to get when they walk in. 

To be accurate with photos is tough beause if you do nice glam shots, guys complain about "heavier than pics", "shorter than expected", etc. If you do some that are non glamorous and do your best to make sure they see all the flaws then they complain that you need to take better ones. Which is it?

Most of us ladies want to please you, but it honestly gets frustrating trying to figure out what each of you are looking for. This guy wants face pics, that guy wants a butt shot, the other wants to see you from every angle, and then you have the critics...

We have to pick and choose to fit what we feel represents us to draw in the clientle we are looking for. For example, I would love to show my bodacious booty, but if I do then guys think I do Greek...I do show it but I have to fend off the kinky ones, and this is just one example.

Maybe if you guys spoke up about what you would like to see then ladies could get a better sense of what to take pics of(if it is within their comfort level). I mean, the pics are to advertise us for your pleasure, and I know for me personally, that I would love feedback because how else would I know what you like if you don't tell me. Or maybe I am wrong and even the bathroom pics are enough to entice the men to call. After all, I have seen some pretty sad photos, and she is getting reviews up the wazoo.

I do agree that there are ladies that have gained considerable weight, gotten older, or changed appearances that don't update their photos and that is misleading. I even know some gals that still work, and have photos from almost a decade still up...I wish my age could stay frozen in time like that. ;-p Suck it up and get new pics...get a friend to take a few for free, it is really that easy if money is the issue.

Lastly, guys...write honest reviews. I really get tired of hearing my clients tell me about girls misleading them with photos or service because they read a glowing review and that is not what they got.  Too many girls are getting "Get Out Of Jail Free" cards because she isn't taking your money and running, but gives lackluster service yet you say it is great. You work too hard to have your money thrown down the drain on someone doing a half-assed job of this. We want to do this then we do our part...you guys want to play and review then you do your part as well. From there, the other guys can truly decide on what is best for them and not have to read between the lines. Just like us putting our reputation on the line when we reference, your reviews do the same.

xoxo,

Samantha Sheppard

 

9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Stevie, believe it or not. In the business, I have met many providers over the years. Some of the girls looked great in their pictures. Then, when I met them in person - :o:o:confused::confused:.  Needless to say, not at all like their pictures. In my head I was thinking that if I were a guy booking an appointment and that is what I saw when the door opened, I would not be happy. Some girls use old photos or photo shop their pics to death. My comments have nothing to do with their personalities. Just based on looks, which is why most guys book at appointment.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Wendy Whitney said:

I agree with Stevie, believe it or not. In the business, I have met many providers over the years. Some of the girls looked great in their pictures. Then, when I met them in person - :o:o:confused::confused:.  Needless to say, not at all like their pictures. In my head I was thinking that if I were a guy booking an appointment and that is what I saw when the door opened, I would not be happy. Some girls use old photos or photo shop their pics to death. My comments have nothing to do with their personalities. Just based on looks, which is why most guys book at appointment.

Kinda surprised at this, Wendy.

On the one hand, if a fellow describes a providers appearance 100% accurately, one can always find something to criticize. Are you encouraging clients to consistently write reviews that describe every single physical flaw a lady has, if it is not shown in their ads? Seems like a license for cruelty.

And on the other hand, even though I have never deliberately tried to mislead anyone, If a few extra pounds or some other physical attribute does not bother me and I fail to mention it, I am now to be accused of writing misleading reviews?

This makes me sad.   I have decided that writing reviews has become too difficult and troublesome.  Too many opportunities for hurt feelings.  It is just not worth it. 

Edited by Laplace
spelling
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Wendy Whitney said:

I agree with Stevie, believe it or not. In the business, I have met many providers over the years. Some of the girls looked great in their pictures. Then, when I met them in person - :o:o:confused::confused:.  Needless to say, not at all like their pictures. In my head I was thinking that if I were a guy booking an appointment and that is what I saw when the door opened, I would not be happy.

OMG 😲 Wendy your killing me softly! 👀😷

😭😭😭

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Laplace said:

Kinda surprised at this, Wendy.

On the one hand, if a fellow describes a providers appearance 100% accurately, one can always find something to criticize. Are you encouraging clients to consistently write reviews that describe every single physical flaw a lady has, if it is not shown in their ads? Seems like a license for cruelty.

And on the other hand, even though I have never deliberately tried to mislead anyone, If a few extra pounds or some other physical attribute does not bother me and I fail to mention it, I am now to be accused of writing misleading reviews?

This makes me sad.   I have decided that writing reviews has become too difficult and troublesome.  Too many opportunities for hurt feelings.  It is just not worth it. 

Laplace, you don't have to get technical, but for some guys certain physical appearances are a huge factor to them setting up the appointment. Not all guys want to see a girl for her personality or skills...some guys truly only see girls with certain physical attributes no matter how bad she is or how she presents herself. I can tell you that a flat tummy is one of them. I can tell you that I have guys that find mepretty, but will never see me because I do not have a flat tummy. I would love to wish the darn thing away, but hey, I am a mom and not 21. Life happens, but there are plenty of girls out there that do and those ladies cater to that need.That is the wonder of having all varieties in this business. So, when you fail to mention something of that nature or she fails to mention(even if it something that is sensitive in nature), it IS misleading. 

As someone once told me; reviews are to let other hobbyists know that she is legit, that she looks like her pics, that she provides what she advertises, and that she was paid what was agreed upon. While they are a fantasy, they are a basis to let people decide if that person is a fit for them. They are not a love story nor a way to get in favor...they were strictly started to allow men a way to find what they were looking for and avoid trouble. It may seem cold, but that was what I was told and how I always view them.

If you really feel it is more of a problem to deal with then don't write them, but don't do it because you got your feelings hurt. If people are getting their feelings hurt then maybe they need to reevaluate the situation and fix whatever is the issue, or ignore it. If I had a penny for every time someone said something negative to me...I ignore them, but I would be very rich! LOL!

xoxo,

Samantha Sheppard

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Laplace, not trying to make you sad. 

 I am a believer in the heart and soul.  Outside appearances are something... but, to me, not the most important. 

 Beening a provider, we are judged on our looks, first and foremost.  Secondary, sexy words that entice men. Third, reviews (maybe). Great tits, great ass, etc. That is what the majority of the clients look for in a provider.

Some of the ladies I met were not like their pictures, at all. As I tried to mention, they were beautiful inside.  If I were booking an appointment based on looks and then the pics not being accurate, I would have been disappointed. 

 

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, SultryKitten said:

As someone once told me; reviews are to let other hobbyists know that she is legit, that she looks like her pics, that she provides what she advertises, and that she was paid what was agreed upon. While they are a fantasy, they are a basis to let people decide if that person is a fit for them. They are not a love story nor a way to get in favor...they were strictly started to allow men a way to find what they were looking for and avoid trouble. It may seem cold, but that was what I was told and how I always view them.

 

Some johns lie about what a provider looks like in his reviews. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Accurate pic of my Kitty! Taken last Friday morning. unnamed.jpg

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mister Reuben the man of house! He owns me and my heart. Definitely not a cold morning guy. Unless you hold the treats!😁

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/16/2016 at 7:11 PM, Badboy said:

 Damn, I will never forget my sixth girlfriend, 21, about 5' 4" and every bit of 165 pounds and still in my memory she is one of the foxiest and definitely the sexiest lady I have ever had the privilege of worshiping - if she put on another 20 I bet I would still feel the same way.

Now that you're done patting yourself on the back for being so progressive, perhaps you could acknowledge that not everyone is OK with banging heavy women.

There is nothing wrong with having preferences -- providers have them, and THEY are the ones getting paid.

I applaud stevie for pushing back against false advertising.  I've seen several cases where providers had to update their decade-old-30-pounds-ago pictures because enough guys did a 180 when the door opened.  Too many guys go through with the session, then post a too-kind review because they're afraid of retribution :cool:

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now