Guest

Sex or Guns?

83 posts in this topic

Never will I give up my guns. Nor is giving up sex. Its just not an option for me. 

I took my very fist gun to school (gasp!, unloaded of course). Back in the days before the first school shooting  even happened. It was a rifle, shot .22 ; longs. Single shot , and I still own it along with a couple others.


3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Jez UaBriain said:

Never will I give up my guns. Nor is giving up sex. Its just not an option for me. 

I took my very fist gun to school (gasp!, unloaded of course). Back in the days before the first school shooting  even happened. It was a rifle, shot .22 ; longs. Single shot , and I still own it along with a couple others.


Oops! I meant to say I took my very first gun to school for show and tell. Remember that little scenario in grade school? The nuns weren't to thrilled, but I and my class mates all thought it was cool. I was about 8- or 9 yrs old.. So yeah, I am a believer in the right to bear arms. Have been since childhood.

 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be willing to bet that whatever countries you visited that you dared not stray too far from the tourist safe zones. Most countries South of the border are hell holes, and there are tigers in the shadows. 

And I believe the choice is guns. Pussy is always on the mind of invaders, without guns, how can we defend our pussy? I realize it may sound hot to some to be passed around a horny horde of invaders, but in that scenario ladies your pleasure is the least consideration. It is a great risk to have a vagina in an unarmed society. That's the world we live in.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, jhooker said:

It is a great risk to have a vagina in an unarmed society. That's the world we live in.

Perhaps having a vagina should be requirement for having a gun.:cool:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, jhooker said:

It is a great risk to have a vagina in an unarmed society. That's the world we live in.

If I everrrrrrr stop laughing, I might come up with a response to this....Maybe not.

I don't even know where to start, LMFAO.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, jhooker said:

Pussy is always on the mind of invaders, without guns, how can we defend our pussy? I realize it may sound hot to some to be passed around a horny horde of invaders, but in that scenario ladies your pleasure is the least consideration. It is a great risk to have a vagina in an unarmed society. 

Sooooo ........... when we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq it was to get at all those hot pussies under the burqas??? :eek:  That actually makes more sense than some explanations I have heard!!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok that makes about as much sense as all the Republicans suddenly siding  with the oompa loompa. Try ignoring the career criminal old hag, oompa loompa, insane socialist, and vote for Gary Johnson. He's more likely to legalize pussy, and for all those who love our Constitution and the 2nd amendment he will protect that as well. It's a win win. 

But to say a gun protects pussy is schtoopid! Or if you have a pussy you're safer with a gun. Not! My guns are locked up safe and sound in a safe deposit box. My pussy is safe because I take other actions to protect it. Like self defense classes. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is basic understanding throughout history, and I used the raw terminology because we are open on this forum. Maybe there wasn't much pussy in Afghanistan, I wouldn't know, but the invading Russians raped hundreds of thousands of German women and girls, the Japanese made a morbid game of it in Nanking, we did it in Vietnam, the Moslems are renowned rapists from spawn to current day, ancient history it was part of conquest, the native Americans would capture females, so what is stupid about American males protecting their females? What is stupid is to think that because we have advanced in communication and transportation in the last century that people are any different today than 1000 years ago. Sex is great, for sure, but to say choose one or the other? 

"This is my rifle this is my gun, this is for fighting this is for fun" 

I'll keep my rifle........and my gun 

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're comparing apples to oranges my friend. What happens in the middle east and sadly what Muslims are doing in Europe is not happening here in the United States of America. I do agree 199% that you should never give up your right to bear arms. Until a person comics a crime,  they have that right. But the way you worded it was dumb. And, you can't make the argument for guns that it protects pussy. It's demeaning and offensive. I and every other woman in this country is way more than what's between her legs. I am sure somewhere in your post you were trying to say that, but you failed. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, jhooker said:

It is basic understanding throughout history, and I used the raw terminology because we are open on this forum. Maybe there wasn't much pussy in Afghanistan, I wouldn't know, but the invading Russians raped hundreds of thousands of German women and girls, the Japanese made a morbid game of it in Nanking, we did it in Vietnam, the Moslems are renowned rapists from spawn to current day, ancient history it was part of conquest, the native Americans would capture females, so what is stupid about American males protecting their females? What is stupid is to think that because we have advanced in communication and transportation in the last century that people are any different today than 1000 years ago. Sex is great, for sure, but to say choose one or the other? 

"This is my rifle this is my gun, this is for fighting this is for fun" 

I'll keep my rifle........and my gun 

Wow, what a racist and xenophobic comment. I apologize to all our TOB friends that may be Russian, German, Japanese, Native American, and those who might be a Vietnam Veteran or Muslim.

Jhooker what you forgot is all of this was done by MEN! Men in the name of "some religion" usually Christianity. Men deeply disturbed by war. Men in the name of their country. The way I see it, guns are not the problem. That would be MEN. 

One man with one gun, against an Army will not save his pussy.

Maybe, the better idea is to teach your fellow man to have respect and love for women and children!!

Violence begets violence.

The world has changed from a 1000 years ago, sadly some men still grunt and pound their chest. "Me man, my pussy, grunt grunt"

 

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kashmir said:

... I apologize to all our TOB friends that may be Russian, German, Japanese, Native American, and those who might be a Vietnam Veteran or Muslim.

 

 

As one of those veterans, I thank you. 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So is it now racist to recognize that there are races? If I referred to human racial segments as tribes would that be acceptable? I think I'll just drop the whole idea of debating such things as the second amendment on this forum. 

13096356_866963810097017_3746326159323492688_n.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jhooker said:

So is it now racist to recognize that there are races? If I referred to human racial segments as tribes would that be acceptable? I think I'll just drop the whole idea of debating such things as the second amendment on this forum. 

 

You didn't "recognize that there are races". You lumped every single Japanese, Muslim, Vietnam US soldier, Russian, Native American, and German, in with those who raped. Unfortunately, the fact that you didn't differentiate, looks kinda racist. 

Generalizations are usually very poor comparisons. as this instance proves. 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jhooker said:

So is it now racist to recognize that there are races? If I referred to human racial segments as tribes would that be acceptable? I think I'll just drop the whole idea of debating such things as the second amendment on this forum. 

13096356_866963810097017_3746326159323492688_n.jpg

Time freaking out!!  We are all entitled to our own opinions, but we are NOT entitled to our own facts.  The HIGHEST estimates of the total indigenous population of the entirety of North and South America that died directly or indirectly (diseases mainly that they had no immunity for brought over by the Spaniards) from the time of Columbus forward (spanning almost 500 hundred years -  300 of which were before the US even existed) is 100 million.  There was no US government prior to 1776 and the US certainly has never controlled the entirety of two continents.  So while the actions of the European settlers AND the official actions of the US government against the native people was indeed horrific and inexcusable, to make the above assertions is beyond ludicrous.  It is patently false and willfully misleading and down right dangerous if enough gullible souls are found to believe it.  What was intentionally perpetrated upon Native Americans stands as one of the greatest travesties in human history WITHOUT the need to embellish it with outrageous and unfounded claims.  And the majority were not "slaughtered" for that matter, but rather died from disease, etc.  Bottom line you don't have to lie to make your point when you already have a great one with just the truth.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

... And the majority were not "slaughtered" for that matter, but rather died from disease, etc.  

Let's not forget that Columbus traded smallpox for syphillis. 😱

Yes, many indigenous people in the Americas died of European diseases for which they had no immunity. But it was not an intentional act; the transmission of disease was very poorly understood at the time. 

Hindsight is a poor lens for history. We cannot evaluate historical acts out-of-context, but must judge them by the knowledge & mores of their time period, not ours.

We must also remember the slaughter was not one sided. Many peaceful innocents were massacred by those same indigenous peoples.

This does not excuse the slaughter & mayhem, it merely adjusts the scale with intent. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, pfunk said:

You didn't "recognize that there are races". You lumped every single Japanese, Muslim, Vietnam US soldier, Russian, Native American, and German, in with those who raped. Unfortunately, the fact that you didn't differentiate, looks kinda racist. 

Generalizations are usually very poor comparisons. as this instance proves. 

 

You are wrong, what I said was INVADERS generally practice rape, it is a historical fact. Then some wise guy said there wasn't much action in Afghanistan or something to that effect, then that's when I generalised and said that conquering armies have always done this. Now tell me, am I wrong? Every race, doesn't matter.

So how is this even remotely racist? Did I say any one race was guilty and another not?

The question here is, I thought, would I rather have a gun or have sex. I should have refrained from commenting on such a dumb topic, but stupid me I thought I could have an opinion. My thoughts are based on the link between personal protection and the natural tendency for a man to want to protect those he loves and are vulnerable. Therefore I believe the two are not to be viewed as a one or the other option. I used crude and highly sexual terminology because I mistakenly thought the users here were a little less uptight. How I ended up as a racist is not a complete mystery, any time anyone thinks anything independent that disagrees with the quo, that person is a racist of course. Does it matter what race I actually am? What if I'm black? What if I'm Asian? 

I like this forum, I like this community, I've met some of you, pleasantly, would never say who, so relax. I may be some things but a racist I am not, not in 20 lifetimes. 

So back off, unless your an asshole and just want to argue.

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People are the only problem with almost every serious we face here on Earth.

We are all by nature prone to being: Greedy, Power Hungry, Selfish, Competitive, Deceitful, Conniving and Revengeful individuals.

I am a Christian. I am not violent towards anyone. I strive to improve the quality of others and my life at all times. I work super hard every single day to be a "good Christian".... And... Every day I fail. I am constantly bombarded with temptation towards revenge, greed, competitiveness, conniving schemes etc etc etc. This all coming from one of the "good" people here on Earth who is actively working on doing the "right" thing at all times.

> The African slave trade has stripped many African-Americans of the ability to grow up in families of privilege, living outside of major poverty, receiving proper education, being a product of good parenting and being accepted as equals all over the world. They were just doing their 'thang when assholes thought it would be a great business effort to kidnap them and transport them to America to do all the hard shit work for nothing more than impoverished conditions and daily beatings and lynchings.

> The Hitler/Nazi movement to annihilate all Jewish people was probably the 1st anti-Christ who through his insanity and drug induced stupor attempted to get the whole world to believe Jewish people had no place here on Earth simply because they were Jewish. They were just serving God when this asshole thought it would be great to "clean" up the world by removing all people of Jewish decent.

> The Native American people who were slaughtered for pure greed and power were subjected to not only senseless deaths, but were exposed to many diseases and alcoholism that they never even knew existed. They were just living off the land, using every piece of the animals they killed and trying to preserve the Earth because of their great respect for all life.

> The Hispanic/Latino(a) population has been made to look and feel like the unsightly cockroaches of the world. We offer them jobs that NO person here in the United States would ever want to do without being forced. They do a lot of jobs that we find our prisoners forced to do while in prison...sad. Yet they happily accept these jobs with a smile on their face, and eagerness in their work production. These were just people trying to escape countries that were extremely violent and horrifically impoverished in search and in hope of a better life to give their families they so dearly love.

There are many, many more examples of our horrendous nature.

What is wrong with Us? This is NOT just a certain race, gender or religion that reeks havoc... it's just People in general.

Guns are NOT the problem.... People are THE problem. And I should clarify even more... Rotten People are THE problem.

I HATE guns AND would NEVER own one... BUT I know a lot of non-violent and non-racist people who own them. Having lived out in the country most of my life I understand the value of owning a gun lol. It was how we got a lot of our meat. Cows would disappear, and my dad would just say they must be wandering way out in the pasture somewhere. I would cry incessantly over them being missing. My mom would then ask me to go out into the garage to get some steaks out of the deep freeze. It was full of my poor lil missing Larry, Moe and Curly. It never dawned on me until I got old enough to understand death :-(

If the right people own guns... they will always do the right thing. Put guns in the hands of maniacs, and you will get udder (lol) chaos and mayhem.

Anarchy is reserved for those who know no boundaries...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hot Violet said:

Wars are never started because of "pussy", nor finished for it.    

Perhaps.  You seem quite well read and articulate,  so you might want to read a bit on the evolutionary biology/genetics side of things.  Anthropologists and psychologists are prone to ignore a lot of very inconvenient data (as one old prof of mine once sarcastically said: "If you find data that contradict your theory, throw out the data because good theories are hard to come by").  If you're interested in expanding your world view, a good place to start is "The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature," by Matt Ridley.  Or, you could simply start with Helen of Troy whose face was reputed to have launched quite a little squabble....

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the basic resources of a tribe or people is pussy, without females your enemies may out populate your tribe. To say it's stupid to put things so elementary is stupid. Even today there is a war happening and you don't know it. Processed foods over decades has caused alot of infertility . At the same time minority females are giving birth at remarkable levels. But hey I'm just a racist xenophobic idiot right , and here I go again, of course there can't be anything to this.

Exactly 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/19/2016 at 6:34 AM, Hot Violet said:

"Men are the displayers, and women are the choosers." 

 

I have never ever worn makeup or lipstick.. ever.  I dont know how these rumors get started. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎5‎/‎19‎/‎2016 at 6:09 AM, Hot Violet said:

 The Red Queen hmm... that doesn't have anything to do with Henry VIII's mother, Elizabeth who married King Edward does it?  I love books about sexual selection, evolution, and genetics.  

   

Actually, Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland.  The faster the Red Queen runs, the more she stays in place.  She can never "get ahead.".  Ridley's hypothesis is that there in no such thing as "progress," because time always overwhelms advantage.  There is change, but not progress. Thus, no matter the successful adaptation, it is transitory and the struggle for existence never gets easier because one's competitors are also always adapting. 

If you love the topic, this is a good read.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now