Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
demonlover

Very detailed reviews

43 posts in this topic

I don't think this is the first time we have been here. YMMV isn't cautionary it's realistic. Every person every session is different, what is the truth for one is not true for another despite how detailed a review might be. A review is NOT a menu of services but merely what the individuals involved consented to. A detailed review is nothing more than that individuals "fantasy".

Really, I generally agree with you, Luce. It is true the listed activities cannot be relied upon as a guaranteed menu. I agree flatly with that and always have. It is, as you say, what the individuals consented to, but that is where the value lies for me ~ to let me know what is "possible".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't like them either and they also throw in the "ick" factor. I feel they are overboard from whats needed. I've always felt that in reviews the activities listed allows for the information on what the girl offered, and then the response portion should discuss her personality, the incall, the whole feel of the experience.

That's just my two cents ;)

The activities listed in TOB are very limited, and nothing compared to the extensive list offered on P411. For example, when it comes to the BJ, TOB offers the option of UTF and TF, but not CIM or NQNS, both of which may be important to some clients. As you know, many providers don't list their "activities enjoyed in private" in their P411 profiles, so reviews are the only way to get more detail of what one might expect with the provider.

I recently was with a provider who complained how little detail there had been in her reviews, which seemed irritating to her given her extensive list of activities that might give her a "leg up" :) on the competition. I find many "fantastic" reviews uninformative as they'll just tell me the client had a great time, but not what was special about the provider. There are a whole lot of ladies with fantastic reviews, so I'm looking for info as to which of these ladies I would want to see.

I agree that the blow-by-blow (pun intended) descriptions aren't necessary, for example, which positions the client enjoyed, but I know I write more detail than needed, but I do that for me. Depressing as it may be, I know one day I'll be too infirm to hobby. What better way to reminisce than to read my reviews:)? I ain't taking pictures, so the reviews are all I have to remember the heat/passion/excitement I felt.

To the OP who felt the detailed reviews were "ick", remember, we guys are paying for fantasy sexual encounters, so expressing one's "fantasy fulfilled" is all part of the fun.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the OP meant "icky" as in gross. I think he meant "ick" as in too personal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont gross me out just dont a big fan

I try to treat everyone diffrently so I ask not to be too detailed

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think the OP meant "icky" as in gross. I think he meant "ick" as in too personal.

Well, just to clear up any confusion:

ick·y/ˈikē/

Adjective:

  • Sticky, esp. unpleasantly so.
  • Distastefully sentimental.

Funny, you think icky can translate to "too personal".:rolleyes:

I think icky means gross. I think most people think that too. But hey, what do I know anyways?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think the OP meant "icky" as in gross. I think he meant "ick" as in too personal.

Well, just to clear up any confusion:

ick·y/ˈikē/

Adjective:

  • Sticky, esp. unpleasantly so.
  • Distastefully sentimental.

Funny, you think icky can translate to "too personal".:rolleyes:

I think icky means gross. I think most people think that too. But hey, what do I know anyways?

ick·y

/ˈɪk i/ Show Spelled [ik-ee] Show IPA

adjective, ick·i·er, ick·i·est. Informal.

1. repulsive or distasteful.

2. excessively sweet or sentimental.

3. unsophisticated or old-fashioned.

4. sticky; viscid.

Synonyms

1. revolting, nasty. 3. gummy, gooey, gucky.

You guys just don't go to the right dictionary sites :rolleyes:

I can certainly see how "too personal" can be seen as being repulsive or distasteful....and therefore "icky." I don't agree with it (having grown up on Penthouse letters to the editor), but I can understand it.

Edited by hgritstoo
horrible spelling
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not having grown up with penthouse forums, call me old fashioned and distasteful!

ick·y

/ˈɪk i/ Show Spelled [ik-ee] Show IPA

adjective, ick·i·er, ick·i·est. Informal.

1. repulsive or distasteful.

2. excessively sweet or sentimental.

3. unsophisticated or old-fashioned.

4. sticky; viscid.

Synonyms

1. revolting, nasty. 3. gummy, gooey, gucky.

You guys just don't go to the right dictionary sites :rolleyes:

I can certainly see how "too personal" can be seen as being repulsive or distasteful....and therefore "icky." I don't agree with it (having grown up on Penthouse letters to the editor), but I can understand it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally don't like to write overly detailed reviews but do find some helpful. The ones I find laughably offensive are the ones where the guys write flowery embellishments and claim some kind of mystical connection over and above just an hour of great fun.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not having grown up with penthouse forums, call me old fashioned and distasteful!

Not old-fashioned, just deprived. My wife got us a subscription to Penthouse in 1980, long before the availability of porn with the click of a button. She enjoyed the Forum as did I---well-written erotica that still left much more to the imagination than today's internet porn, which was nice. I wouldn't think of calling you distasteful, though I haven't had the pleasure of your tasting:), but I do understand your finding detailed reviews distasteful.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread was informative because it makes me wonder about the reviews I have written. I know everyone has a different take on this - I dont like going into too much detail - but I do like to know a little about the lady I am going to meet and reviews help me get a sense of that. Reviews that all over the map make we wonder - because I know some people can have an off day and take that into consideration.

When I first started writing reviews - I followed somewhat of the format others did - and I guess they had a 'ickness' to them - but since then I look more at the passion and how much I enjoyed the time I spent with a beautiful lady. Dinner, wine, chocolates, gifts, shopping etc - what does the lady enjoy and even do research on her likes - music, art, readings, etc - so I can add to that experience, otherwise we probably wont meet.

I don't hobby as much as I use to and take my time because for me - it is about the total experience - and maybe it is a fantasy of mine - but the reviews do help me understand a little of what our time together might be like. But again YMMV - and I have been there too often.

I also look at who the reviewer is - because I have a tendancy to trust reviews that have a common thread to them and if the reviewer has seen the same lady a number of times - tells me a little about the chemistry in meeting the person.

Anyway - thanks for the 'food for thought'!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Uxor enim dignitatis nomen est, non voluptatis." ('Wife' connotes rank, not sexual pleasure, or more literally "Wife is the name of dignity, not bliss")

We keep mistresses for our pleasures, concubines for constant attendance, and wives to bear us legitimate children and to be our faithful housekeepers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it just me, or do reviews that list all of the fantasy activities (ahem) blow by blow really gross you out? Not only does it really ad no worthwhile info, but it seems to me both TMI and disrespectful to write "she reached in my pants and then we did UTF followed by tasty 69 followed by clean fresh DATY then we moved to mish then doggie then I popped and then we...". You get the point. This tells me very little about the provider or even the experience, and often reads more like a very bad letter to Penthouse than a review. Knowing exactly what some other gent did with a lady (and often the exact order in which it was done) just has a high ick factor for me. Anybody else?

I'm a great fan of Carlos Slim reviews. Methinks the man has a Masters in Review Writing. :D

Or maybe a PhD?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem with that is that sometimes there isn't a lot of talking going on. It's hard to get a read on personality when things are purely physical.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0