Rob4132

I sent a cropped torso pic so she has some idea of my body type, but she said that's not good enough. I've never had a provider require a face pic before (and she doesn't require references or any other screening). There were a couple other red flags; I asked a basic question in the opening message that was ignored twice before she answered it, which often means a bot was auto-replying but could also mean she just got used to copy/pasting an initial reply. How common is it for providers to require a face pic? She's on Tryst and has a couple of reviews on TER, and a local area code, which usually means she's legit but I'm still hesitant to send my face to her.

I see a lot of concern, both here and elsewhere and from both providers and clients, about avoiding law enforcement. Am I missing something? I thought it was a simple matter of just not being explicit and then we were in the clear. EG, the following conversation: ME: "Hi, I saw your ad and was wondering if you are free for a date this weekend. What is your rate for one hour outcall?" HER: "My time is $400/hour. When would you like to meet?" ME: "How about Saturday at 10am? My address is _____." HER: "Okay, I will see you then." That's basically the gist of how my conversations go. I never bring up anything sexual and I immediately stop replying if she does. I assumed that's all we need to do and that it's technically not even illegal since we never discussed pay-for-play, so it doesn't even matter if LE is involved because no laws were actually broken. But I see so many people concerned about LE and how important screening is on both sides to avoid LE. Am I missing something? Or do most people just not avoid explicit talk like I do? And is there a way to safely do explicit talk? I had to cut off a potential provider a while ago because she got way too explicit in the texts, and I felt bad because she was exactly the look I go for. I've also ended up getting a non-FS lapdance/massage from a girl listed in the "Escort" section of Eros (not too big of a deal though because I kind of like tease-and-denial anyway...). So if that "never be explicit" rule isn't something we need to follow or if there's some other way to weed out police it would obviously be helpful. Especially since I've heard of (but never encountered) women who charge lower hourly rates but then "upsell" when you meet, which would obviously have to involve explicit pay-for-play talk.