dbarwell

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    81

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dbarwell

  1. Posted

    14 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

    Whine all you want, does not change the facts.  No one "flew into a rage" OR "hurled insults at you" - simply state the facts.  AGAIN

    ...why is it always the people talking about "stating facts" who consistently spit out stuff that isn't true?

    "They're being trafficked!" - not true, you made that up. "They're under 21!" - not true, you made that up.

    I'll just repeat what I said long ago - if the site doesn't want ads or reviews from agencies, then great. But it'd be great if that ban didn't extend to the 411 forums, there's no "danger" to people asking about girls in the forum. There's nothing in the forum rules that says we can't, and no moderator has ever said we can't.

    I'd personally like to be able to use the 411 forum to get info on any woman, even if they're at an agency. So it'd be great if @Kaduk or @TheWhisperer could weigh in on that and clear it up, and if the answer is no, then that's fine, that just needs to be communicated to us and the forum rules need to be updated.

    But, they still haven't commented on the situation, only a small handful of people like you who are pretending to be mods and admins and trying to enforce the rules of the site on others, and frankly, that's just not helpful at all.

    0

  2. Posted

    10 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

    More pure bullshit.  Name one agency that has a membership and posts ads as an agency.  Numerous of the almost daily posts amounted to pure free advertising and several of the ladies were under 21, which is the threshold age here, and all of them mentioned the agency.  And the fact at the time of the first thread they were virtually all Korean nationals means duh trafficked.  No matter how many times you whine, yes it has been thoroughly explained more than once.  The three links you post are fine examples of if they are over 21 and advertising as independent and not Korean nationals then you can post 411's, reviews and see them to your little hearts content.  But THAT is NOT what was going on with the daily shill fest for the agency in question at the time.

    lol so Eastern European women working for an agency and pretending to be independent is okay to talk about in the forum. But Korean women who work for an agency and don't try to hide it are banned from being discussed, and if you try to bring it up and ask why, everyone here will just fly into a rage and hurl insults at you

    Got it...

    0

  3. Posted

    On 11/1/2024 at 8:47 PM, ilovewomen said:

    It has been explained to you why you’re not supposed to talk about GO and others like them.

    You're just being obstinate.

    A competing board here in Denver got shut down because of the discussions and support of Amps.

    Nobody wants that to happen to TOB…or do you want that to happen?

    It hasn't been explained actually, it's just been speculated on by the users of this site. I asked the mods to chime in on this earlier in this thread, but they never did.

    Also, GO isn't an AMP. And nothing bad will happen to this site if people are allowed to post 411 threads about the girls at GO.

    You're so worried about agencies, but this site already allows ads and reviews from agencies. These girls (and the 7-8 others that are advertised on their website) are part of the same agency:

    https://theotherboard.com/users/165202

    https://theotherboard.com/users/165510

    https://theotherboard.com/users/167400

    And they're the same as GO. Foreign women who travel to different cities for weeks at a time. But for some reason we can talk about them, but not GO.

    -1

  4. Posted

    11 hours ago, sparkey600 said:

    Gee, do you suppose that's because they are all trafficked girls and women? Do you suppose that's the reason they are banned on TOB? Do you think that's the reason? Do you think, no you don't think, you are part of the problem. You like trafficked women. Get bent.

    lol y'all really believe this "trafficking" nonsense, huh

    If you don't like agencies because they take away from local independent providers, then that's fine, but you don't have to make up this dumb lie to justify your stance

    0

  6. Posted

    They've been brought up here before, I posted about my experiences here:

    The gist is that they are constantly taking down their TER profiles every few months, and then making a new one with a similar, but different, name. They get rare reviews there, not sure if they are legit or not.

    Some of their pictures on their websites are not them. Not sure if they are all fake, but most likely, I was able to confirm a few of them on Tineye are from other websites.

    I've contacted both of them, and received responses. I gave references and tried setting up specific times to meet them, but then they eventually stopped responding.

    I don't know if it's a "scam", but there's definitely something off about the whole thing. If it is a scam, I don't know what the scam would be, they didn't ask for a deposit, or attempt to blackmail me, or show much interest in actually meeting up.

    I'd just forget about them, the pics aren't real and are too good to be true. I don't know what they're up to, but better safe than sorry.

    1

  7. Posted

    Chloe Conifer 720-583-3327
    Colorado Companion

    Chloe Conifer used to be a provider in Denver a couple years ago, but then she shut down her website and seemed like she stopped working. I always wanted to see her, but never got the chance.

    I heard from someone else that she's back, although her website and old phone number still don't work

    Just curious if anyone has seen her lately and can vouch, or is this a case of someone using her old phone number as a scam?

     

    0

  9. Posted

    I've asked about Vivienne and Emmeline before. No one here has seen them.

    There's something off about them, as well as another provider

    https://epicureanviv.wixsite.com/vipviv

    https://tresexyemms.wixsite.com/emmselite/photos

    https://wonderlandreservat.wixsite.com/thefairy

    This trio of women all have very similar Wix sites, with the same vibe of photos. I assume they're all stolen, I know Vivienne's are (https://tineye.com/search/a775db199f0f2ebf36c3128fc2510fd417038b33 and https://tineye.com/search/cba636dec5788b3c1bf36a751b04531419f61367), and I think the others stole their photos as well.

    Somehow, these beautiful women with reasonable rates, work in Denver, and nobody on the most popular board in Denver has ever seen them...it's bizarre.

    I've reached out to all of them once of twice. Vivienne and Kate The Fairy have responded once, but then I never heard from them again after I replied.

    I dunno, something is just off about them. If it's a scam, I don't know what the scam is supposed to be, since they don't ask for deposits and don't seem to want to meet up. I don't think they're LE, since again, they don't seem interested in meeting someone who is eager to get together.

    1

  10. Posted

    1 hour ago, gr8owl said:

    There is plenty but you would ignore it if I listed it

    lol oh that's convenient

    "I have plenty of evidence, but I can't show you..."

    Feel free to list your reasons as to why you think this agency is trafficking women

    1 hour ago, gr8owl said:

    I believe they already did when they closed/locked the original thread AND combined the new one you immediately created so that it too is locked.  Too subtle for you?

    Nuance is probably lost on you, but it's not clear at all.

    If I ask about a provider at another agency, will that be locked? Or is it just Girls Offices? My thread was moved into the old Girls Offices forum, but where would my post about a girl at a different agency go? It's not against the rules (currently) to ask about agency providers, yet the thread was locked - will I be punished if I do it again next month with a different provider? Will I be banned? Was my post locked on accident? Or was it locked by a mod , but the mod on duty the next time I do it won't care?

    You're way too focused on "AGENCIES BAD!" and apparently can't think about anything else, we're just looking for clarity on what is and isn't allowed.

    Soooo I guess I'll just keep asking until I get an answer:

    @Kaduk  @TheWhisperer can we make 411 posts in the Individual 411 forum for providers who are part of an agency? There's nothing in the forum rules that says we can't, and no moderator has ever said we can't. If the answer is no, that's fine, that just needs to be communicated to us and the forum rules need to be updated.

    I feel like this is a super simple question, and everyone is getting incredibly emotional about it.

    0

  11. Posted · Edited by dbarwell

    1 hour ago, gr8owl said:

    there is a distinct difference between asking for information about one independent lady - what the 411 forum is for

    Except I did exactly that - once I saw that the big Girls Offices thread was locked, I wanted information on one of their providers. So I created a 411 post asking about that specific provider, and that thread was just removed with no explanation.

    I did exactly what you claim you have no issue with, but I was called a shill for doing the thing I've done 20+ times before, people just got irrationally upset because the provider I asked about works for an agency.

     

    1 hour ago, gr8owl said:

    And doing so when the agency in question has all the appearances of trafficking Korean women,  THAT is an excellent way to get fed attention and get taken down.  Why is that so hard to understand?

    Uh, because it's complete nonsense. There's no indication of trafficking going on, you just made that up. And TOB is protecting themselves by (rightfully) not allowing ads from agencies. But there's no issue with us asking about them in the forums, there's nothing in the forum rules that says we can't, and no moderator has ever said we can't.

    At this point, we really need a moderator to weigh in and settle this, I'm really surprised they haven't.

    Simple question: can we make 411 posts in the Individual 411 forum for providers who are part of an agency?

    @Kaduk  @TheWhisperer can you weight in on that?

    If the answer is no, that's fine, that just needs to be communicated to us and the forum rules need to be updated.

    -1

  12. Posted

    1 hour ago, MeganMarie4u said:

    Yall got the whole God damn internet to talk about agencies.....  but here we are on a review board for indy girls...  🤡🙃

     

    If you don't like the way it's handled find a new sandbox. Or a new hobby!

    This site is not a review board for indy girls

    0

  13. Posted

    18 hours ago, ilovewomen said:

    I said it once and I’ll say it again….

    I DON’T WANT AMP’s or AGENCIES ON THIS BOARD BECAUSE THEY ARE LOW HANGING FRUIT FOR LE AND THAT CAN BE THE RUIN OF TOB IF TOB IS ASSOCIATED OR LOOKED UPON AS PROMOTING AMP’s and AGENCIES.

     

    A. You're not a mod, so what you want is completely irrelevant

    B. I actually agree with you (and the site) that we shouldn't allow ads from agencies - but to extend that ban to the 411 forums makes no sense, there's no "danger" to people asking about girls in the forum

    0

  15. Posted · Edited by dbarwell

    4 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

    ...Six pages of running commentary and daily updates as to what the flavor of the week is at an agency ....... what the hell else is that besides free advertising/shill/endorsement...

    You say you're not dense, yet you're bringing up some other random thread in another forum...got it :) If you have a problem with this six-page thread on an agency, go over there and complain about it, I don't know why you've decided to raid my post

     

    4 minutes ago, gr8owl said:

    Up to the mods and owner of the board here

    Which isn't you, so go play hall monitor somewhere else.

    There's nothing wrong with my post, just trying to get info on a provider like everyone else on this forum

    -1

  16. Posted

    1 minute ago, gr8owl said:

    No. I have a problem with the daily shill for an agency called girlsoffices.  The thread of that title. That you have previously posted to lol.  Information regarding the agency, its services and its flavor of week travelling lady should be easily obtained from the agency without the daily shill/ad for said agency here.  When member ladies have to pay for their ads.

    :lol: That's the entire point of this forum - to gather information on providers who don't have ads or reviews on this site.

    Are you dense? This is absolutely pathetic, we might as well shut down the entire forum if you want to label it a "free ad" any time someone mentions a provider here.

    -1

  17. Posted

    1 minute ago, gr8owl said:

    same as the thread just locked.  Free ad/shills for girlsoffices.  I am sure the agency should be able to answer the question and any similar.

    What thread? And how is this an ad?

    I found a provider in Denver, and I'm simply asking for other people's experiences. Just like every other post in this 411 forum.

    If you're upset about this girl, you're just gonna have to get over it and get a life. Do you have a problem with this Vicky or something?

    1

  20. Posted

    I eventually reached out, here's the info she sent me

    Quote

    I provide what I like to call a sensual healing experience. I take all sessions in my sexy lingerie, and use hand to body touch to get comfortable with one another. I base my sessions off of mutual comfort, connection and intimacy! I also offer things like topless, interactive mutual touch & even fully nude with more of a body to body experience if you enjoy closeness like me. I do prefer to be completely transparent in the fact that I do not offer any illegal services, and feel free to ask any clarifying questions- I'm very open about what I do and do not offer!

    These rates are on top of my base rate of 150/hr :) I can offer mutual touch for 50, topless for 100 and then the other options above!

    I can do fully nude for an additional 200! And can add the more body to body experience for 50 if you're interested in that :)
     

    So basically $400 for a fully-nude massage with no HE

     

     

     

    0

  23. Posted

    1 hour ago, shy_n_quiet said:

    Look like we got a hot one in town! I saw Miu Miu earlier and she is one of the best models I have seen so far from GO. She is young looking and has a stunning face, an athletic body, and a charming personality.  Top-notch GFE service.  I bet that we will see lots of 9/10 reviews coming soon. Run, don’t walk to your nearest booker before it’s too late! LOL

    Are there any better pics of her online?

    The pics on the site look like they're about 15 years old

    0