whatagame

The thrust of your post wasn't political. Tacking on a call for the prosecution of BLM protesters was. Same with equating them to Q'anon here. But you know that.

While I would love to take you up on such a sweet invitation, I Googled 'waste of time' and found, "trying to debate someone who posts this: 'If you can tell me one thing that is going well in this country right now [i.e., If you disagree with me.] i will think you are delusional." So, nah

"Garbage like this is why the 'politics' category was created. "

Rather than read all 44 reviews, I took the easy route and did a quick image search. This page makes me think the OP is probably right that this is not the Diana that will be answering the door. Just because I wanted grounds for disparaging PD reviews (again), I decided to go ahead and check some of hers. The second one starts, "Not the girl in the picture . . ."

I love how these discussion boards, as well as socials, serve as another form of advertising, helping us decide whom we want to see and who should be given the widest of berths. As much as we men have fantasies, And true not everyone needs a FS provider. I have some clients who just need someone to talk to! Either way a woman giving herself to you is a lot to begin with so be happy we are even willing to give you any of us ❤️ this should be priceless we also have nightmares.

I didn't read my reviews until I got the "negative review" email--not sure how 'so-so' is negative, seems just not positive. Some description of activities cut, though no more XXX than what remained. Some comparison to others from the same agency. Some commentary on actual time. I would say overall the edits made the review less negative because it masked some problems. Harsh, to me, connotes unwarranted personal attacks, like some of the rebuttals, so I'd say it wasn't too harsh to begin with.

As is, TOB reviews are marginally better than PD (I think they’ve resorted to AI over there). Aside from the occasional helpful acronyms, the only useful information most provide is, you’re not likely to get busted. What’s wrong with TOB reviews? A partial list - Seems some guys are just happy with whatever. Some guys are afraid of the repercussions (I’ve heard from guys who won’t walk away if who answers the door doesn’t match the ad for fear of being banned; that has to transfer to reviews). Some reviews are highly suspect. Just look at everyone they’ve reviewed and their affiliations. I think of them as dedicated reviewers, i.e., employees. One thing I recently noticed and has put me off writing any more reviews here is that what I submit isn’t what gets posted. I don’t mean it's declined: reviews are significantly edited and posted as if that's precisely what I submitted, so it’s not worth the effort to write an honest review. The rebuttal process is a joke, most often used for provider/agency retaliation. Of course, that’s the crux of the problem: TOB is for providers (they pay, we don’t), so TOB protects providers at the expense of those who might see them.

Emailed her a completed screening form and heard back in less than 20 minutes. Yours is a head scratcher.

I have pretty much the same approach you do to arriving enough ahead of time to be on time. The response time you get is a bit worse than I experience (in fact, at +10 I'm out of there), but it's rare that I get an immediate response and walk in at the scheduled start time--on time ain't what it used to be, if it ever was. I don't get too concerned with that, and I get the impression you don't, either. "Time shaving," on the other hand, sucks. I never do 30 min., so I wouldn't know about that (though I can't imagine those who shave off 60 don't shave off 30). Shaving off 60 seems to be the norm, often ten minutes but sometimes 1/3 of the scheduled time (and I'm talking walking in to walking out, not naked playtime), especially with agency girls. So, switching to shorter sessions wouldn't help. In fact, if you're getting 1:45 of 2 hours, you're ahead of the game. But, those jewels who provide the full time still exist. They get repeat visits, which I'm guessing the shavers don't care the least bit about.

She's not unique in that, though it's not the norm. A few well-reviewed providers currently in Denver list multiple home cities. I could be mistaken, but I seem to remember women changing their hair color. I could be mistaken, but I seem to remember providers touring. Indeed

Yes. A couple of thoroughly enjoyable evenings.

This would undoubtedly make reviews more useful for men selecting providers, if that’s their purpose. The idea that you can always pm the reviewer assumes both that you are aware of the need to ask a question and that the reviewer will be more honest privately. The former is mystifying, the latter possible but by no means likely. The idea that reviews are just opinions has some validity, except when it doesn’t—when the lady is 30 lbs. more than her pictures, claiming she is an exact match is inaccurate, not merely a (subjective) alternative fact. Since reviews for showing up and walking away aren’t posted, open, public dialogue is the best solution.

The OP engaged in victim blaming when he said providers are subjected to ncns because of their rates. That might be read as an attempt to get them all to lower their rates (actually, how could it not?), which is the very definition of haggling. As for the rest of this, Holy crap! where do you find the time? I'll spend my free time this Sunday subjecting myself to the imaginative activities one of the (fairly compensated) ladies who advertises here can come up with.

Classic victim blaming. All I can make of the logic is, Why spend all that time haggling with providers one at a time when you can haggle with them all at once?

Welcome! And, thanks for one of the all-time great smiles.