whatagame

Seems the guys who rely on your reviews would want to know who you're talking about; otherwise, this just looks like click bait.

I used to have a No deposit policy. Since I jettisoned it, deposits have led to some of the best sessions I've had. By the same token, I've as good as lit money on fire following up on good pictures and TOB reviews. As always, the key is research and clear thinking; then roll the dice and see what comes up.

While the sheriff and his deputies seem intent on protecting the general store, be nice if they could spare some concern for providers who have to put on a disguise to avoid stalkers, maybe someone in this thread, and move this information off their radar if they haven't come across it yet.

Perhaps she wasn't being malicious, though posting the information of someone who tried to rip you off does carry a hint of retribution at the least. Mere carelessness is dangerous, too. At least I'd think so were it my information. Perhaps she shouldn't be banned, but some might want to avoid her. You, of course, are free to entrust her with any and all information about you. As for the other 'outer,' that seems an unfortunate lapse in judgement. Not all things that share similarities are equivalent.

I mentioned you - to piggy-back on your astonishment in this thread that outing is no biggie to some, including admin, here (We’ll delete it, but you’re here/free to do it again) I thought you had called out the outer (what my initial post says) I didn’t say you had outed anyone. I hope you’re the only one who misunderstood that.

My bad: I thought it was you. A provider outed someone by posting his real world name. Another provider (apparently not you) called her out for outing him. The thread was up for a couple hours mid-day yesterday. The thread's gone, but the dangerous provider is still advertising, at least as of 4.30am today.

Yesterday's deleted thread (that you called out for outing) created by the still-advertising provider proves outing is still no biggie. Huh Be nice if that proponent of risk-minimization owned up to the risk anyone who gives her any information exposes himself to.

I think the captcha analogy references everything Phil and Bravo list--show your human by ... So, once he's done all that and laid down the donation, she'll decide if she's feeling it. Definitely one type of gfe, but maybe the one that sends guys here rather than the one they come looking for.

Replying to the op’s post, because I think we all know the rules of decency Phil addresses - since only No or So-so reviews get scrutinized, bogus positive reviews get waved through, even when they have obvious bogus tells (e.g., review of new provider by brand new member, though other clearly bogus methods also get a pass). And, let’s not forget that what appears in reviews here is edited by the whims of TOB. It seems to take multiple corroborating reviews to know what’s generally available. I have more luck finding those on other sites. I have no problem asking, and they’re free to answer or not. The problem there is that those who would encourage the deception of a bogus review have no problem lying. You win some; you lose some. My favorites are the ones that get rained out.

Board tutorial - When you see the user's forum post, click on their name. That takes you to their page with all their posts; click on Profile (upper right). Above the top picture in their Profile, click on My Listings. AA posted availability on April 27, 2024.

It would be great if EM were the only place that happened. It's frequent on numerous sites, depending on what drives the site. Eventually, you learn to spot how the system (assuming it's for the benefit of those looking for providers, is being gamed). There really is some work involved in doing your homework.

The thrust of your post wasn't political. Tacking on a call for the prosecution of BLM protesters was. Same with equating them to Q'anon here. But you know that.

While I would love to take you up on such a sweet invitation, I Googled 'waste of time' and found, "trying to debate someone who posts this: 'If you can tell me one thing that is going well in this country right now [i.e., If you disagree with me.] i will think you are delusional." So, nah

"Garbage like this is why the 'politics' category was created. "

Rather than read all 44 reviews, I took the easy route and did a quick image search. This page makes me think the OP is probably right that this is not the Diana that will be answering the door. Just because I wanted grounds for disparaging PD reviews (again), I decided to go ahead and check some of hers. The second one starts, "Not the girl in the picture . . ."